Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katiedidit1
What was it we told them again? I believe it was; “If you keep on supporting as weak a candidate as Santorum is, you will guarantee Romney the nomination!”

They refused to understand what we were trying to say went blindly ahead out of spite anyway. Now, we will all live with the result.

So, we still have to continue on, and that does not include pouting or quitting. We have to do the very best with what we have left to work with. There is no other choice.

307 posted on 04/04/2012 10:23:10 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]


To: PSYCHO-FREEP
PSYCHO-FREEP, from the very onset..it was Newt that was the true threat. More money spent to take him out than Santorum could have dreamed of...
Romney is doing very little to unify the conservatives. I am waiting for the convention to make my decision. Sad day when the voters lost the opportunity to elect the greatest president since Reagan. Even Nancy Reagan and Michael Reagan spoke very highly of the Speaker.
IMO...Santorum was never the threat to Romney that Newt was..ever.
314 posted on 04/04/2012 2:12:32 PM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson