Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ETL

Yep. I understood and they have conceded that point. But the fact is, they ran with the younger photo from the beginning. They only “clarified” after the pic became an embarrassment.

AP’s image sucks.

Now, how do you explain their clear bias? Is the source the Journalism Schools? Is the source the parent news companies who pay them? For profit companies supporting these Commie Bastards makes no sense. Or are they all convinced they cannot survive without the corrupt central government in alliance with them?


79 posted on 03/31/2012 4:55:18 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Fossil
But the fact is, they ran with the younger photo from the beginning. They only “clarified” after the pic became an embarrassment.

Yes, you're right. Still, it is a very rare moment when the left-wing/liberal media concedes anything. Notice, however, (unless I missed it?) that they don't actually admit they themselves were guilty of using the old and "deceptive" (their word) photos.

87 posted on 03/31/2012 6:20:04 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson