This from yesterday, but I have not seen it posted. Interesting to hear Stretch Kerry and other Dems to respond. Imagine how stupid some like Ben Nelson will feel having this struck down after it ending thier career.
1 posted on
03/29/2012 1:50:12 PM PDT by
Sybeck1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Sybeck1
If like Kerry says this has been totally vetted, why did they exclude Republicans completely from participating?
2 posted on
03/29/2012 1:52:45 PM PDT by
rawhide
To: Sybeck1
"The court commands no armies, it has no money; it depends for its power on its credibility." Do liberals really think this way?
The court depends for its power on its Constitutional status as the highest level of the judicial branch of government.
Idjits.
3 posted on
03/29/2012 1:53:18 PM PDT by
Oberon
(Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
To: Sybeck1
I keep waiting for lightning to strike these people.
Their dishonesty is breathtaking.
4 posted on
03/29/2012 1:54:51 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface)
To: Sybeck1
“The court commands no armies, it has no money; it depends for its power on its credibility. The only reason people obey it is because it has that credibility. And the court risks grave damage if it strikes down a statute of this magnitude and importance, and stretches so dramatically and drastically to do it.
Kind of like creating a right of ‘privacy’ and then twisting and torturing the English language to make abortion legal?
To: Sybeck1
CTA (covering their a$$es).
6 posted on
03/29/2012 1:56:11 PM PDT by
DallasDeb
(usafa06mom)
To: Sybeck1
Kery : I can tell you that we had one of the most rigorous and transparent legislative processes that I have witnessed in almost 3 decades here in the Congress.”
...
We had to pass it to find out what was in it. How is that transparent??
7 posted on
03/29/2012 1:56:26 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: Sybeck1
Just the usual suspects "warning" Supreme Court justices.Kinda like Osama Obama dissing certain members of the Court in a State of the Union speech.
8 posted on
03/29/2012 1:56:58 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Jimmy Carter Is No Longer The Worst President To Have Served In My Lifetime.)
To: Sybeck1
I’d wager “Kelo” already did some major damage.
To: Sybeck1
ROFL....the arrogance from the left over the healthcare debate is staggering.
To: Sybeck1
"throughly vetted by whom"...Parsley O'Bozo/Premium Gas Pelosi!???
14 posted on
03/29/2012 1:59:06 PM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
( Kill all the terrorists, Protect all the borders, ridicule all the (surviving) Liberals :^)
To: Sybeck1
Must not be going well for the libtards!
15 posted on
03/29/2012 1:59:27 PM PDT by
airborne
(Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
To: Sybeck1
Everybody learns in the first year of law school that the law thats challenged is presumed to be constitutional, Blumenthal said.”
I didn't know that. It explains why the Necessary and Proper clause is kryptonite to the Left. Since the people are the sovereign, there should be a presumption of liberty and not a presumption of constitutionality.
16 posted on
03/29/2012 2:00:04 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(No court will save us from ourselves.)
To: Sybeck1
I can tell you that we had one of the most rigorous and transparent legislative processes that I have witnessed in almost 3 decades here in the Congress.... Three hours. Tops. For members and the public to read it, prior to the vote. 2700 pages. So, 15 pages per minute, to read it. Result? NOBODY read it. That's Rigorous. That's Transparent.
18 posted on
03/29/2012 2:00:34 PM PDT by
C210N
(Mitt "Severe Etch-a-Sketch" Romney is the front-runner? Seriously??)
To: Sybeck1
Vetted? Really? By whom? The Dems that voted for it didn’t even read the damned thing. This is a blatant attempt to intimidate The Court by 3 sitting Senators by referencing the Courts reliance on the Senate for funding.
19 posted on
03/29/2012 2:00:43 PM PDT by
JrsyJack
(a healthy dose of buckshot will probably get you the last word in any argument.)
To: Sybeck1
How low-brow of Kerry and his merry band of democrat senators to threaten the Judicial Branch.
20 posted on
03/29/2012 2:00:53 PM PDT by
Rapscallion
(The corruption and mismanagement persist because YOU tolerate it.)
To: Sybeck1
By threatening the "credibility" of the Court the 'rats are essentially detaching from the rule of law, dropping yet one more of their many masks of sanity.
To: Sybeck1
Ralph Kramden:
"Why don't you shut up....."
24 posted on
03/29/2012 2:02:41 PM PDT by
Victor
(If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
To: Sybeck1
The court commands no armies, it has no money; it depends for its power on its credibility. The only reason people obey it is because it has that credibility. And the court risks grave damage if it strikes down a statute of this magnitude and importance, and stretches so dramatically and drastically to do it. I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; ...
26 posted on
03/29/2012 2:03:01 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Sybeck1
We worked with some of the brightest, most thoughtful and experienced constitutional Marxist lawyers in order to make sure that the law was constitutional. - Sen. Kerry
27 posted on
03/29/2012 2:03:50 PM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Sybeck1
Yes, I can clearly see why the Democrats would claim that the SCOTUS, upholding the rule of Law according to the letter of the Constitution, would see this as a “discredit”.
BUT DO IT ANYWAY! Discredit me please!
28 posted on
03/29/2012 2:03:50 PM PDT by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson