Posted on 03/28/2012 7:35:29 PM PDT by Kukai
The tough economic times of late 2008 produced an once-in-a-generation leadership opportunity that a talented, attractive and multi-ethnic young president might have exploited to achieve good things for all Americans.
Unfortunately, President Obama has shown over three-plus years that he’s not that leader – unless killing Osama bin Laden is somehow all that matters. Indeed, in light of a record replete with domestic and international fumbles, including a budget deficit driven to unimagined levels and persistently high rates of unemployment/underemployment, Obama ought to be soundly defeated in November.
However, with so many Americans now feeding at the government trough, his defeat is far from a sure thing.
But still lurking in the media shadows is a compelling constitutional question that won’t leave Barack Obama alone. Obama’s long-form birth certificate, released by the White House amid great fanfare last spring, was recently and very publicly derided by a the nationally known Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County (Phoenix) Arizona.
Finally, after four years of media-abetted obfuscation of Obama's ever-changing documents, someone in authority is finally willing put his reputation on the line and publicly ask raise questions that should have been unambiguously answered years ago.
Ironically, a revival of this political sideshow may be what derails the Obama re-election effort in November. Here’s why: Obama’s self-touted long-form birth certificate, forced into the public arena by then-candidate Donald Trump last spring, was almost immediately exposed as a simplistic cut-and-paste construct -- yet this story has gone ignored for almost a year.
Indeed, an Adobe Illustrator pro and video game writer in Atlanta, who goes by the YouTube handle orangegold1, downloaded the document from whitehouse.gov and quickly exposed it as fraudulent. Orangegold1's initial 7-minute YouTube video depicts a step-by-step forensic deconstruction of the document. This video has had nearly 1.3 million hits thus far and its detractors' criticisms have been thoroughly answered in Orangegold1's follow-up videos.
So will legitimate concerns regarding the latest versions Obama's latest birth documentation continue to go unknown to most Americans? Unfortunately, it's hard to count on reporters and editors in the so-called elite American media to do the right thing in lieu baseless of cheer lead for Obama.
Indeed, the Arpaio investigation has been widely reported in other countries, but so far the story has been covered domestically only by the Washington Times and World Net Daily.
But should the story behind Arpaio’s investigation eventually gain media traction in the U.S., Barack Obama's re-election campaign could be in serious trouble.
You need to request the presence of all of your representatives so that they can be asked why there has been no action on their part.
I’ll be there ...I was at Joe’s presser as well
The forger is in Hawaii, no document was printed out. The file was emailed to someone close to Obama and posted on the WH website. I believe one copy was printed out for a chosen few to "look" at. The forger probably didn't think about the layers as he/she was probably under the assumption that the PDF would be printed to show the public the two copies and had no idea that the actual file would be available for downloading. If anyone thinks that someone flew to HI to pick up the "two" certified copies then I have a bridge for sale.
Cute tag.... ;)
Thanks for the ping, nully.
Kate_Malloy...I remember Sheriff Joe saying that now that he has all this information he has to decide who he’ll give it to. I’d love to know the answer. If there’s a Q&A maybe you could attach that to your own list of questions? Thanks in advance. I’m envious but very glad you’ll be attending. Keep us posted.
Exactly what I think. The only thing I would suggest as a an alternate possibility is that the forger might not have been aware that the layers would expose his(her?) work, or he(she?) may have just forgotten to flatten the image file. Obviously the people handling the file on the White House end were ignorant (probably because they are stupid democrats) and and didn't know they would be posting the evidence of it's own creation when they posted it.
I have suggested that this file may have been sent to Obama's Attorney as a "proof" for him to peruse to insure compliance with his request before the court to amend or replace the document. It would be quite an easy thing for a man knowledgeable in law, but ignorant in the nuts and bolts of computer technology, to send the file on to other ignorant staff members at the White House. Perhaps Obama himself sent the file to his staff after having received it from his attorney?
In any case, this idea makes more sense to me than any other explanation of which I have heard.
Trent's office said they would usually get an invite to attend such meetings and he had not gotten one, and I told her that I was inviting him. He is my Fed. Rep. and not my State Rep. but I would like him to attend. I believe he will if he has no prior engagement.
I wrote your question down and will ask him should I get the chance, azishot
I’m waiting for the Trayvon Obama bc to hit the wires.
It’d be nice to meet you. I’ll FReepmail you.
Nuff said....
“The forger is in Hawaii, no document was printed out.”
I think it is highly unlikely that HI officials had anything to do with creating the forgery. There was no logical, legitimate "adoption" scenario involved in justifying this forged pdf. HI officials most likely only received an electronic image from Chicago (the source of all criminal acts behind Barry) with layers of plausible deniability for the transmission of the pdf to protect both the WH and HI.
HI DOH places a printout of the pdf in the archive, then takes it out and makes a copy and “certifies” it for the charade of having a lawyer take that copy back to the WH.
The key screw-up was failure to flatten the pdf file by the person in the WH entrusted with “releasing” the image to the web.
I would agree with you had the forger not put a smiley face on Alvins signature and an X marks the spot possibly indicating Alvin was ordering him/her to create the document.
All I know is this. When the truth comes out you and I, in the collective, will be high fiveing and back slapping each other all over the place!
I will offer that the forger is not in Hawaii.
Except for Fuddy most of the Hawaiins have tried to walk a tight rope on this.
Brian Schatz would not sign a document that indicated Obama was eligible in 2008. He clearly had the eligibility removed from the 2004 template and tried slide it by the elections staff. When it failed Pelosi had to submit the legally required documentation.
Even Janice Okubo’s statments (or the statements she drafted that went out under Fukino’s letterhead) were carefully worded in November of 2008 and July of 2009. In November of 2008 she just said ‘we have records’ period. And the press praised the resolution of the issue. When that did not work they offered up the more beefy statement in July of 2009 after the House of Representatives passed the resolution for Hawaii’s 50th birthday and included that it was the birthplace of Obama. Even that statement had weasel words like ‘the records indicate...’. Well of course by then some sort of records somewhere said ‘born in Hawaii’. And even the ‘natural born American citizen’ is a careful way of feeding the press what they want without actually using the actual Article II, Section 1 verbiage.
And remember the nominated HDOH doctor who was forced to withdraw due to never confirmed reports of issues in his past. He must have signaled he would not play ball and was toss aside and smeared in the process. Even Abercrombie himself got wishy-washy after promising to clear this up in early 2011.
Fuddy’s behind is hanging out. She clearly provided the cover letter to the White House for the April 27, 2011 event. Unless she is lying - in writing - she probably did provide something to the WH attorneys. Did they fly all the way to Hawaii? Probably not. But if she provided real records that were then altered and manipulated and presented as real by the WH she is guilty of staying silent. But assuming she did provide records she and her lawyer probably have copies as their hidden (hopefully) get out of jail free material.
So the Hawaiians have played ball for the WH...but they obviously have stop short of (most) actions that would send them directly to jail should this blow up - which it now is.
Only when those who have knowledge feel more personally threatened by those on the right side of this and start making deals will the dominoes start to fall. This will put the ‘useful idiots’ and pawns in jeopardy. But this is price of being being a pawn in the game.
The Hawaiians that know are Schatz and Okubo and Atty. William Gilardy - Stanley Ann’s lawyer when she divorced Soetoro. Those three should be put in separate rooms until they come clean.
good, we’ll meet....BTW....few here yet realize the response is another brick in the bridge.....i.e. the response was needed......hehehehe
Thank you, SO MUCH!!! Looking forward to hearing from you.
HI DOH places a printout of the pdf in the archive, then takes it out and makes a copy and “certifies” it for the charade of having a lawyer take that copy back to the WH.
What you postulate is a criminal conspiracy with the tacit approval/involvement of the DOH staff in Hawaii, as well as the Governor of Hawaii, and Obama's attorney as well.
Unless there is extraordinary evidence to support this extraordinary claim, I have to believe in the more mundane explanation that the document was created legally through the DOH in Hawaii. The only way I can see such a thing happening is if Obama was legally adopted in the past.
I will mention once again, that *I* am adopted, and *I* have a fake birth certificate created by the DOH in my state. It's fake, but it's a LEGAL fake.
I too can go to court to get my adoption set aside and resume using my original last name.
The key screw-up was failure to flatten the pdf file by the person in the WH entrusted with “releasing” the image to the web.
I agree with you on this.
Hasn't attorney client privilege expired with SAD's death?
Not sure...seems that is true for her. But of course they would hide behind Obama as a ‘client’.
But I do not think anyone in Hawaii is willing to ‘take the pipe’ (using an old Chicago sayings) for Obama or the Chicago gang.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.