Why did the officer write down the statute Zimmerman supposedly violated when he didn’t know what happened?
GZ admitted he shot the subject, and was brought in for questioning under the said alleged charge???
It’s an initial crime report, the officer lists an offense that seems to match his observations. It’s based on initial impression, and has little if any significance in the scheme of things.
In order to arrest someone a cop needs to specify the law he thinks a person violated. In various jurisdictions the report itself may or may not contain the law violated but the original report should include the law a person has been arrest for violating. Otherwise, imagine a defense attorney claiming the police went fishing.