“None of those are facts. Those are statements from Zimmerman.”
Actually, a lot of them (e.g., the Hispanic being on his back with a broken nose, the Black on top of him beating him senseless, the confrontation occuring back near the SUV) are known because of 3 eyewitnesses and clear physcial evidence.
The only thing that relies on Zimmerman’s direct evidence is how the fight started.
The defense would have the burden to prove an on-going assault to prove self-defense -— this is easy to do.
As a result, to defeat the self-defense claim, the prosecution would have the burden to prove “illegal provocation” by the Hispanic started the fight.
The only evidence is that the Black came up on the Hispanic and cold-cocked him. (Also partially confirmed by the fact that the ultimate fight was back by the SUV.)
The Hispanic seems credible. All attempts by race-baiters to show racila bias (he said “coon”!) have been disproven.
Instead, what we now know about the Black is he’s been suspended from school repeatedly, beat up a bus driver, sold drugs, and was caught with burglary tools and stolen jewlery.
Indeed, it sounds like the Hispanic did a great thing ventallating this thug before he committed more serious crimes.
The "witnesses" looked out only when the screaming Zimmerman was getting his butt kicked.