[garjog]

When we have such a loser for president, why are we about to put a dweeb like Romney up? Come on. Is it because he can fund so much? Money bags must have an appeal when running against an incumbent.

If Obama wasn’t destroying the nation with the explosion in food and gas prices, I’d almost agree with Rick.

We need a better candidate. Dang. Please God, not Romney. He will Etch a Sketch his way to liberalism in nothing flat.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

“When we have such a loser for president, why are we about to put a dweeb like Romney up?”

-

Because the GOP establishment saw Sarah Palin as the same sort of threat to them, as she was to the GOP establishment in Alaska.

That is why.

[matthew fuller]

"When we have such a loser for president, why are we about to put a dweeb like Romney up?"

Because that's what Republicans do! 08= McCain, 96= Dole, 88+92= GHWB, 76= Ford, 72+68+60= Nixon. The only keeper was 80+84, Reagan. 64=Goldwater might have been a keeper, but he lost to LBJ.