Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Worries About 'Committing A Santorum'
CNN via wibw.com ^ | March 20, 2012 | Reporter: CNN

Posted on 03/20/2012 9:22:10 PM PDT by VinL

Edited on 03/20/2012 10:31:59 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich said Tuesday that Rick Santorum "probably didn't mean to" say that he doesn't care about the unemployment rate but that it still illustrates a broader problem with the former Pennsylvania senator.

"I know that Santorum probably didn't mean to say it, but it's what he said," Gingrich said. "And, you know, when you're going to take on an incumbent President of the United States you better know what you believe. You better be able to say it very vividly. Can you imagine a Barack Obama dealing with somebody who says he doesn't care about the unemployment rate?"


(Excerpt) Read more at wibw.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2manynewtwordsgorick; evangelicalsvsnewt; evangelicalsvstp; gingrich; givenewtachance; givenewtricksvotes; gope4santorum; gopehijackedteaparty; nomessage; rick4himself; rick4mittsvp; rickhijackedteaparty; rickscrewedteaparty; santorum; vote4newtnotrick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: itsahoot

Are you a complete idiot? There are lots of jobs that don’t depend on manufacturing. This is about writing preferential treatment into the tax code. Social engineering. “If you behave the way we want you can have a tax cut.”


81 posted on 03/21/2012 11:28:29 AM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Grasp at straws much? It’s pretty well known that all Gingrich supporters wouldn’t jump on Rick’s bandwagon. Are you one of those “head in the sand” people that believes Rick is gonna smoke Romney in places like California, New York, New Jersey and Delaware. Good Luck. You should be putting your effort into preparing for a brokered convention not chasing rainbows.


82 posted on 03/21/2012 11:34:33 AM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

There are plenty of articles detailing his attempt to write preferential treatment for manufacturers into the tax code. It’s pure social engineering. The government allowing you to keep your money as long as you do things they like. His big labor record is common knowledge. Minimum wage hikes etc.

http://double-taxation.com/2012/03/12/is-mcdonalds-a-manufacturer/


83 posted on 03/21/2012 11:43:56 AM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
“I came to the House as a real deficit hawk, but I am no longer a deficit hawk. I’ll tell you why. I had to spend the surpluses. Deficits make it easier to say no.” –Rick Santorum, 02/5/2003

What an idiot!

84 posted on 03/21/2012 11:45:42 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
He was doing the bidding of the voters who voted down “Right to work”. Santorum BETTER listen to the voters of his state.

Mr. Rick could have led a reform movement, as unions represent everything conservatism objects to... Seems to me that would have been a principled stand, albeit one that might have cost him his job. That would have been truly courageous.

85 posted on 03/21/2012 11:52:34 AM PDT by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: caww

[What an idiot!]

I know! And his brain dead following has no clue, as to who or what he is.

(Ship of Fools)


86 posted on 03/21/2012 11:52:59 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
Santorum has less than a 10% chance of winning......... "So you are telling me, there is still a chance!".......
87 posted on 03/21/2012 11:58:54 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
I know! And his brain dead following has no clue, as to who or what he is.

Right...and they really don't care....they swallowed the bait and pride will stand in the way now. Nobody wants to be a fool...even if they are just that.

88 posted on 03/21/2012 11:59:01 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

LoL....lol...


89 posted on 03/21/2012 11:59:54 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Either Santorum or Romney’s fine with the WH...Obama can run the same campaign against either.

either will wind up looking like Warren Jeffords of the FLDS on a good day when the MSM are done with them by mid-October....


90 posted on 03/21/2012 12:01:29 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Santorum all the way! He’s gonna smoke Romney in New York, New Jersey, California, Delaware....... :)


91 posted on 03/21/2012 12:01:29 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan
And in PA as well as Texas, (Texas, closed proportional) which by then, Newt will have dropped out. And they can learn exactly what it means in regards to Newt staying in and doing Santo and us a favor.
92 posted on 03/21/2012 12:14:40 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Rick has a shot to take some remaining states, but from all the analysis I have seen he has to sweep a bunch of very moderate/liberal states (not just win either; win big) in order to just come close to Romney.


93 posted on 03/21/2012 12:22:10 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
That is what the rule says.

Not quite.

It says that the candidate must have a plurality from 5 states before he can be placed in nomination. It does not say that such a plurality must come from the primary process.

To wit: if there is no winner on the first ballot (and for the sake of argument, let's assume that Newt isn't on that first ballot), and delegates are freed from previous commitments, it is possible for the math to change in such a way as to make Gingrich eligible before a subsequent round of balloting.

94 posted on 03/21/2012 12:31:55 PM PDT by kevkrom (Note to self: proofread, then post. It's better that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Santorum is genuine, conservative, and a good Person. Newt speaksbetter. Santorum still has a chance. Newt doesnt


95 posted on 03/21/2012 12:36:23 PM PDT by Yaelle (Santorum 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Except, the nomination process happens before the first round of voting. I really need to read the rest of the rules. It sounds like they created a nightmare in their ivory towers.


96 posted on 03/21/2012 1:06:49 PM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

I finally had time to translate rule 40 from politico speech to English. Anyone can be a candidate if they can get the plurality of each of five states to support their candidacy. It does NOT preclude Newt, or even Palin, from being nominated if they can get five state delegations to support them. It has nothing to do, that I can see, with who the delegates might be bound to support. That was the piece I could not find last night.


97 posted on 03/21/2012 1:15:07 PM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Newt’s in right now in my opinion. And he is correct about always speaking in a presdiential manner.


98 posted on 03/21/2012 1:17:09 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Rick has little chance to win the primary process- Newt has no chance.

Their only real hope at the nomination is to extend the process beyond the primary process- and pray Romney implodes.

And given that reality, Rick is better served with Newt in the race— because like him or not, Newt has an idea a minute— and one of those ideas just might mortally wound Romney. Yes, it’s a long shot- but the only one available to Rick and Newt now.


99 posted on 03/21/2012 2:44:27 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan
There are lots of jobs that don’t depend on manufacturing.

Yeah you said that before.

I asked you to name some of them. you didn't.

So I will give you one. Mountain man living on bear meat could actually live with the aid of a knife he pounds out of a rock, but it would be a lot easier if he had a steel knife.

He could forge one himself I suppose if he knew how to build the smelter and a forge and a hammer, but then I guess he would be in the manufacturing business himself.

100 posted on 03/22/2012 10:43:49 AM PDT by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth, as are my comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson