The advance drumbeats for a brokered convention are beginning to beat louder. Seems risky, but - Hey - if it gets Romney out of the picture then it might be the way to go . . .
1 posted on
03/14/2012 1:08:15 PM PDT by
BAW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: BAW
2 posted on
03/14/2012 1:09:59 PM PDT by
NoGrayZone
(Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
To: BAW
Newt has said he was going to do this all along and
explains again why the ruling party is doing a terrific
job to silence him. He will be there fighting. He said it first now the other person is copying his idea.
3 posted on
03/14/2012 1:11:26 PM PDT by
Christie at the beach
(I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
To: BAW
It’d better be.
If it’s RINOmney, I’m not checking the president box.
After all, why go for Obama lite when one can get the whole sleezy, slimy package?
4 posted on
03/14/2012 1:12:01 PM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: BAW
The advance drumbeats for a brokered convention are beginning to beat louder. Seems risky... Worst that can happen is we wind up with a RINO, which is where we are headed now.
5 posted on
03/14/2012 1:12:47 PM PDT by
Joe the Pimpernel
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
To: BAW
To: BAW
No, it wont be a brokered convention, nor a battleground.
7 posted on
03/14/2012 1:13:53 PM PDT by
Ted Grant
To: BAW
Hope so. Sieze the power back from the elites. Or at least make them scramble so they begin to fear the electorate again.
To: BAW
The advance drumbeats for a brokered convention are beginning to beat louder. Seems risky, but - Hey - if it gets Romney out of the picture then it might be the way to go . . . If it's a brokered convention, who's going to be doing the brokering? Hint: it's not the grass roots.
To: BAW
Seems risky, but - Hey - if it gets Romney out of the picture then it might be the way to go . . .No matter who might emerge from such a convention, he or she couldn't be worse than Romney.
10 posted on
03/14/2012 1:22:31 PM PDT by
CommerceComet
(If Mitt can leave the GOP to protest Reagan, why can't I do the same in protest of Romney?)
To: BAW
I’m all in for a brokered convention. Stupid GOP-e and their RINO nonsense. They all thought it would be a cakewalk for Mittens..
To: BAW
I’m down for it.
FUMR and the horse you rode in on. Looks more like an ass and who rides backward and bareback?
14 posted on
03/14/2012 1:26:30 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: BAW
Count on it!
Romney can’t secure the nomination with the state primaries left.
If he is our nominee, we lose big-time!
To: BAW
Sounds good to me. I will never vote for Romney.
To: BAW
I hope it is a battleground. I have been saying for months now we needed a TEA Party march on GOP headquarters...
I think this will do nicely- we even have a date, folks.
show up, bring a large vehicle, food, and water and a porta-potty, and tie up that place like it never has been
24 posted on
03/14/2012 1:38:12 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(If Romney wins the primary, I am writing-in PALIN)
To: BAW
I think all these convention goers are annoyed that they will actually have to do some work instead of the usual party.
25 posted on
03/14/2012 1:42:18 PM PDT by
mosaicwolf
(Strength and Honor)
To: BAW
I will not trade four more years of the Kenyan for eight years of a better bred, lighter skinned . . . Kenyan.
26 posted on
03/14/2012 1:43:26 PM PDT by
surely_you_jest
(Mitt Romney is the latter day incarnation of Joe Isuzu.)
To: BAW; SevenofNine
To: BAW
Seems risky, but - Hey - if it gets Romney out of the picture then it might be the way to go . . . Agreed; nobody that the GOP could stick in there at the convention would be measurably worse than Mitt. So, nothing to lose.
31 posted on
03/14/2012 1:53:16 PM PDT by
Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
To: BAW
I'm not excited by the possibility of a brokered convention, not when Mitt Romney is the man the insiders are trying to push on us against our will. Still, a second round of ballots could not possibly do any worse than sticking us with Mitt. I'm hoping that the "leadership" will accept reality and choose someone not in the race, someone undamaged. DeMint comes to mind as a realistic possibility, a conservative who is acceptable to the GOP insiders. After all, how likely are they to find a modern day Ronald Reagan ready to go? Would they even know where to look?
33 posted on
03/14/2012 1:58:30 PM PDT by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: BAW
“tantalizingly within reach”
The MSM had all but called it for Romney before the votes were counted. lol.
37 posted on
03/14/2012 2:08:38 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
