Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/14/2012 8:06:59 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: DManA
Democrat Presidents, beginning with only Clinton, required that we lock up all the weapons on post in the Arms Rooms, accounting for weapons and ammo. Now we have another administration belonging to the next democrat president, Obama, with the same fobia of the military. Presidents who screw the troops are afraid to be around them, and it is only prudent from a liberals thinking. Only their security detachments will have weapons.

The best time in the world to attack a US military installation for any reason is when a Democrat President or members of his administration are at the base.... Republican presidents have never stowed the arms, since they support the troops.

51 posted on 03/14/2012 9:26:54 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

Is this story really true? I just can’t conceive of any Sec’y of Defense making such a request. Is there any precedent for this?


53 posted on 03/14/2012 9:30:28 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

The reporter is amazingly ignorant of SOP’s.

Anytime you have a mixed group of friendlies and locals meeting a friendly VIP, the friendlies disarm to prevent locals, whom may not be vetted, from disarming a friendly and attacking the VIP.

The reporter is anti-military and attempting to show that friendlies cannot be trusted and are unstable.

No story here.


56 posted on 03/14/2012 9:33:57 AM PDT by gandalftb (11th MEU, 2/4 Echo, TRAP Force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

someone should tell him how dangerous gun free zones are


57 posted on 03/14/2012 9:42:25 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

That’s a real slap in the face for our military. I assume the New York Times ass*oles are lovin’ it. Shame on Panetta...


58 posted on 03/14/2012 9:44:24 AM PDT by GOPJ (Democrat-Media Complex - buried stories and distorted facts... freeper 'andrew' Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

Both Obama and Paneta should stay completely away from American troops. They are not fit to be in the presence of our great American soldiers. I would not want my children or grandchildren to enter the military if it meant serving under these men.


59 posted on 03/14/2012 9:56:24 AM PDT by Reddon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

Note to Mr. Chicken:

A soldier is dangerous even without a weapon.


67 posted on 03/14/2012 10:49:39 AM PDT by irishtenor (Everything in moderation, however, too much whiskey is just enough... Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

Boy, that just speaks volumes.


70 posted on 03/14/2012 11:35:42 AM PDT by surely_you_jest (Mitt Romney is the latter day incarnation of Joe Isuzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

This is really an amazing story. It reveals what is going on in the USA & Afghanistan now days. “Whom do you trust, now days?”


79 posted on 03/14/2012 12:56:41 PM PDT by gghd (A Pro-life Palinista & a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

He’s a treasonous, communist animal who has chosen sides with the enemy. Given that, it would be scarey standing up in from of the United States military. He knows what he is and he’s afraid the marines knowk, too.


90 posted on 03/14/2012 7:54:27 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

For those Marines in Afghanistan who might read this, I want you to know something. We are proud of your itchiness. We are proud of you. And more than anything, know that there are those of us here who, like Yamamoto said, “are filled with a terrible resolve.”

You may be 0bama’s hostages to further his agenda. You may be his ploy to demonstrate how warlike he pretends to be here at home. But, for those of you whose eyes sting back tears from sand or humiliation at Panetta and crew’s political ‘correctness,’ know that there will be a price to be paid for every hair on your heads, should something happen to you.

As for the so-called person who ‘had a brain injury’ and went on to kill ‘innocent civilians,’ there are those of us who find it odd that the sequence of events there started with the Koran burnings, the assassinations of some top US military, the dead American servicemen, this event that included ‘innocents,’ the op that failed in blowing the tarmac for Panetta (oops...bad timing there /s) and the disarming of Marines in the presence of supposedly disarmed Afghans. Well, it’s not a stretch to think the ‘innocents’ killed weren’t women and so forth, or, if they were, they might just have been part of a larger effort to do even more damage to the (what was obviously compromised) visit by Panetta the commie.

You all have a safe day. And here’s hoping business is very good indeed. Today and for the foreseeable future.


92 posted on 03/15/2012 1:01:39 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson