To: cableguymn
"where is your /s your not serious are you?"
Dead serious. mitt can at least balance a budget, talk coherently, deal with world leaders, lead an unruly congress and not go off to war half calked. santorum on the other hand has no real leadership experiance, his time in congress is a monument to establishment puppeterring. When he was let off the strings, his instinct was socialist. As was well demonstrated on the "Right to Work" legislation.
17 posted on
03/13/2012 9:07:44 PM PDT by
JoSixChip
(santorum is Mr Rogers without a spine. Check his record, not his rhetoric.)
To: JoSixChip
Your support of Mitt can get you kicked off around here.
With that said..
Mitt can talk a good talk. But his record says his talk is just that. Talk.
Mitt has taken just about every side of every issue known to man. His actions indicate to me he is a big spending, big government liberal.
I can’t support him. I won’t support him. I am still trying to decide if I can hold my nose and vote for him.
31 posted on
03/13/2012 10:25:44 PM PDT by
cableguymn
(Good thing I am a conservative. Otherwise I would have to support Mittens like Republicans do.)
To: JoSixChip
mitt can at least balance a budget, talk coherently, deal with world leaders, lead an unruly congress and not go off to war half calked. santorum on the other hand has no real leadership experiance I agree. Not sure why your first post was removed...I'm curious to know. I firmly believe that Santorum cannot win the general. I think that Newt can win the general, but at this point it is (IMHO) impossible for him to win the nomination, so I am left with one choice. Frankly at this point I want Newt to stay in to keep Santorum from winning the nomination. (Spare me the flames...they bore me)
46 posted on
03/14/2012 5:59:47 AM PDT by
6ppc
(It's torch and pitchfork time)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson