Replies

I don’t know who you think I am. I’m raccoonnookkeeper. I do not particularly bash Santorum or gang up with Santorum bashers.

Okay, I don't follow you around the forum watching what you say, so I'll take your word for it. As for what I accused you of, let's look at what I was addressing, and what I responded with.

You got to look at everything including where he is at now. Is that where you folks are looking when you take Santorum to task constantly? You ignore what he's been saying on the campaign trail.

It was my take that it has been just fine with Newt's supporters to focus on his past, and ignore his statements on the campaign trail. Something negative comes out about Newt's past, and I'm admonished to take a look at the whole Newt. Why the double standard? That's all I'm saying. If you don't engage in it, I'm sorry for mischaracterizing your actions. Can you now link me to a place where you have taken a single Gingrich supporter to task for not taking the whole Santorum record into account?

I think Santorum has some optics problems if he heads into the election, like no he really isn’t running on a platform of annexing the Federal government to the Roman Catholic church. Are you a Roman Catholic (or comin’ wratholic)?

Okay, then you don't seem to think Santorum is planning on handing the federal government over to the Vatican. I have no idea what you're trying to get to with the rest of this. I'm not a Catholic, but I have no idea what a wratholic is. Perhaps you meant wrathaholic, but I have no idea what that is either.

I’ve noticed you go all potpourri in print when you start to get upset with another freeper. Strange.

Well you're entitled to your own opinion of course, but it would be rather helpful for you to give some sort of an example so that I could address it.

"...all potpourri..." LMAO, God only knows what that means.