well stated !
>>I’m not sure this fight can be won — or even worth the effort. It now seems that fight will almost certainly move to a new and more “kinetic” level. This WILL get ugly.
Yep. It’s going to get “kinetic”. If Obama wins, the people will have to rise up to save the nation from communism. If Obama loses, his zombie hordes will rise up to “take what’s theirs”.
He needs to present a unique vision rather than just trashing others...and he has no unique vision.
Romney is incapable of defeating Obama!
Here’s the campaign in a nutshell:
“More of the Same vs. Less of the Same.”
But since you are a n00b,.......Oh, wait! I don't care if you are right! LOL!
Romney and his mega millions, and his attacks and personal destruction of Newt, is why this is now, officially a disaster. We had a candidate with an honest plan and a vision, but it has ended on the stupidity of the ignorant voters.
Gas/Diesel prices will mysteriously drop below $3.00/gal. by the election. The media cheer-leading about the number of jobs created will continue every month till the election.
Mitt Obomney will most likely win the nomination and go on to be crushed like Dole and McLame.
For me, I'll be voting for the Constitutional Party candidate here in NH. NH will likely go for Mittens so I'm not concerned about “throwing away my vote” like some people here will accuse me of doing.
Hopefully Mittens will be the last establishment candidate we have to suffer.
Obozo or Willard or Santo whom are all OWNED by the Unions.. same difference, different mouth breathing..
Newt is the real NO ONLY option for change from a federal givernment complete take over..
I am surprised that even some freepers are so easily fooled.. and some are..
All three promise great swelling words BUT are OWNED by the same Masters..
I ask you how can you even BE elected in Chicago, Massachusetts or Pennsylvania..
WITHOUT Union support?
The Union Machine in those places is even WORSE than in Wisconsin.. as corrupt as that place is..
Those three people are DRONES.. in the Union Hive..
I am not amused by support for Santo or Willard.. especially HERE..
Many freepers must be dullards..
I am not too smart either ... HELL I’m a republican..
“And because the choice is between Obozo and Obozo lite, a lot of the less committed and uninformed otherwise conservative voters may sit it out.”
I for one don’t appreciate being labeled “less committed and uninformed” because I refuse to support Romney in a general election. He is NOT a choice....you yourself call him “Obozo lite.” I think NOT supporting him sends a message to the country club elite that my vote is ONLY obtained by supporting MY VALUES. Romney does not on many levels. IF the GOP is stupid enough to select him as nominee, I will do something I have never done since the first POTUS election of 1976.....I will stay home or leave that portion of the ballot blank. Starting in 1976 until 2008 I always voted for the GOP candidate, even if they were less than desirable. However, I won’t do this for Romney.
I think, for me, it takes more courage to not vote than to vote for an unsuitable candidate simply to vote against the Obamanation of Desolation.
Will NOT vote for Romney.
Romney will deliver what Obama promises but without protest.
NO BACKSTABBERS.
Ok....so, let’s say I agree with all of your anti-Mitt points...
Where does that leave us?
Santorum would garner a solid 35 % of the popular vote and we’d be stuck w Barack.
I continue to contend that Newt is the only one of the 3 capable of making Obama’s campaign, pure misery.
ya, i know all about the delegate count, which has nothing to do with my point.
Much work ahead. I’m *for* class warfare. Not Obummer’s, but first, We The People vs the Marxists, and then WTP against the entire remainder of the Political Class. An *awesome* amount of work ahead. I hope to live long enough to see the end of it.