Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: opentalk

i STILL wanna know why we are citing Pravda as a source for ... anything???


3 posted on 03/10/2012 1:51:02 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RIghtwardHo
"i STILL wanna know why we are citing Pravda as a source for ... anything???"

Oh come on... you don't see the irony in this? And in this instance Pravda is 100% correct. That hurts even more.

5 posted on 03/10/2012 1:52:59 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

Because they’re telling the “truth”? (look it up)


6 posted on 03/10/2012 1:55:24 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo
i STILL wanna know why we are citing Pravda as a source for ... anything???

Who are you insulting? Pravda, or everyone else?

7 posted on 03/10/2012 1:56:10 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

The article in Pravda is written by a Freeper.


10 posted on 03/10/2012 2:02:02 PM PST by Aria ( 2008 wasn't an election - it was a coup d'etat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

“i STILL wanna know why we are citing Pravda as a source for ... anything???”

Aside from the Enquirer, it is the only legitimate MSM news source.


11 posted on 03/10/2012 2:02:11 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Solyent Pink is Sheeple!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2857297/posts?q=1&;page=1


15 posted on 03/10/2012 2:04:10 PM PST by Aria ( 2008 wasn't an election - it was a coup d'etat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

Because FR cowered in the corner, biting a blanket.


22 posted on 03/10/2012 2:16:12 PM PST by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo
"i STILL wanna know why we are citing Pravda as a source for ... anything???"

Because, unlike the American media, they are not in the tank for Obama.

25 posted on 03/10/2012 2:19:01 PM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

Well..., could it be because you can’t find this truth in our MSM?

Did you ever think Pravda would be a purveyor of truth, and our MSM wouldn’t be?

And yet, on this issue that is precisely what we have here.

What major MSM player has taken an interest in the issue we may have an illegal alien in the White House? I’m not convinced this guy is a U. S. Citizen.


29 posted on 03/10/2012 2:22:53 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo
i STILL wanna know why we are citing Pravda as a source for ... anything???

The Pravda of Cold War propaganda days is defunct; this is a newer media outlet that is utilizing the same name. There's no other connection that I've found, in fact, some FReepers take issue with that site's owner "stealing" the "old" Pravda's name, or something like that. Whatever.

It appears to be as legitimate as other foreign news services such as Costa News, Le Monde and BBC, all of which can be hit-or-miss... but they're putting out more useful news than our state-run media.

Think of it this way: Pravda is now legitimate because the Communists that used to run it are now employed west of the Atlantic.

34 posted on 03/10/2012 2:38:16 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo
Yes, we live in interesting times, don't we?

Pravda, once was a source for nothing but propaganda, is now more reliable than American state run media.

Many here look as though they are red blooded, Constitutional lovin' Americans and in fact, they are merely pretending.

Know what I mean?

49 posted on 03/10/2012 3:07:14 PM PST by GBA (Natural Born American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

Why not? Pravda or other foreign newspaper ...

Have you read or seen the national media discussing the apparently fraudulent document presented by Obama as his birth certificate?

Has ANYONE seen the actual paper document? A judge? The Congress?

Pravda rises a legit question: what is the media doing in America, other than kiss Obama’s pumps?

The president of the United States is accused of fraud, and the media isn’t interested? Don’t you find that strange?


54 posted on 03/10/2012 3:21:18 PM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

Why not? Pravda or other foreign newspaper ...

Have you read or seen the national media discussing the apparently fraudulent document presented by Obama as his birth certificate?

Has ANYONE seen the actual paper document? A judge? The Congress?

Pravda rises a legit question: what is the media doing in America, other than kiss Obama’s pumps?

The president of the United States is accused of fraud, and the media isn’t interested? Don’t you find that strange?


55 posted on 03/10/2012 3:21:24 PM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo
i STILL wanna know why we are citing Pravda as a source for ... anything???

1) Because the woman who wrote the article could find no other venue to get it published.

2) Because the Pravda article is accurately reporting the results of Sheriff Arpaio's investigation of Obama's birth certificate and draft card. I have watched the six videos released by the Arpaio investigation including a 1 hour 20 minute news conference and read the Pravda article and her report is a perfect summary of the results to date.

3) Because the author of the article, Dianna Cotter, is a Freeper.

Please read the article before condemning the "source".

Regards,
GtG

PS It just may be that Pravda's news may be more accurate then domestic sources. At least in this instance.

66 posted on 03/10/2012 4:53:39 PM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

Sad day when Pravda is more honest than the Obama MSM.


67 posted on 03/10/2012 4:55:59 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

“i STILL wanna know why we are citing Pravda as a source for ... anything???”

In the Russian language Pravda means “Truth”, and Pravda has been more truthful than CNN, the Washington Post or the excretive, Jew-hating, America-hating, neo-Nazi newspaper called the New York Times.


69 posted on 03/10/2012 5:56:48 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson