You're right - there are people perpetuating that myth.
There's a legal difference here (goes back to three sisters who couldn't sing and a newspaper panned them or something like that - the Supreme Court sided with the newspaper - forgotten the details - something about fair criticism and comment... ) - might be why dems are pushing the 'testifying before congress' lie. One way she's a 'public person - and we have the right to say what we want about her and her ideas - and the other way - is kine of 'maybe she is - maybe she isn't'. If she's not a public figure they can sue us - and destroy our rights...
Bloggers are a lot more innocent than some third year law student at one of the top law schools. But that won't help us much. The press wants us stripped of our 'citizen journalists' rights too. They'll be heavy into her side. If we lose our citizen rights - if they can established THEY have rights that we don't have - the right to critique public people, they'll feel they can re-establish their role as 'gatekeeper' ...
That's a big incentive for them. And it might work.
If little miss 'I want free birth control' decides to not only sue Rush - but to sue bloggers - and she wins - our ability to made comments about people in the news will be stopped. Who wants to comment if they could get sued - and lose everything?
How honest would you be about some liberal blow-hard IF you knew he could sue you and take everything you own?
If a few of us were thrown in jail and stripped of all our belongings, it wouldn't take long before all of us were silenced.
These totalitarians-in-waiting are playing hard ball - we've got to be careful. Very careful.
Ping
Fortunately, this woman lied like a rug. A months supply of her BC is available 3 miles from Georgetown for 9.00 a month
so her 3000.00 over 3 years, is really 320.00 over 3 years.
Rush ran the numbers. Unfortunately, he handled it poorly. Fortunately, his comments were based on her BARE-FACED LIES.
The woman is finished.
When you sue someone you want to make sure you can at least recover the legal costs. Suing anonymous bloggers doesn't sound like any case a lawyer would take,.
Thank you GOPJ. I appreciate you mentioning this. I had thought she was reporting to a committee, so I was operating under a false premise too.