To: Reagan69
If it means a brokered convention, so be it.
Mitt only needs about 75 more delegates and he's half way to the nomination.
Okay, so he winds up at the convention with roughly 1050 delegates. Santorum shows up with 700, Newt shows up with 550. It is honestly your judgment that the delegates vote Gingrich over either other guy? Why would these folks be loyal to Newt? Their constitutents wouldn't have supported him.
Id rather have romney ANY DAY over Father Rick. So, if Newt does drop out, Im in Mitts camp.
Okay, then you're on the record of supporting Mr. Government Healthcare and friend of abortion over a man who is neither. If that makes sense to you, so be it. It doesn't to me.
I am also curious why you would try to slam a guy by refering to him as Father anything. Don't your morals, our Founding Documents, our guaranteed rights owe their very adoption in their present format to the reality that men based their beliefs on a Judao Christian God?
We have expressed the desire to see our government draw more nearer to our Founding Ideals based on Judao Christian beliefs, here we have a guy who agrees, and you're all fired up to vote for a man who is closer to Ted Kennedy than our Founders.
Say what?
I think a lot of people feel the same.
A lot of people give this stuff very little thought. They see Republican leaders supporting Mitt Romney, and that's all they need to know. Off to the races to vote for Mitt. That's why many of us are sick and tired of the Republican Party leadership. They can't even find a reason to stand up to Obama as of this date. Here you are expressing agreement with those sorts of people.
Why would you want to vote for Obama lite to represent us this fall. Anyone even tempted to vote for that guy as an Independent or a Democrat, would merely vote for the real thing. Why waste a vote on a pretender?
So, how does Newts dropping out help Rick?
Newt would drop out and pledge as many of his delegates as he could, to Rick Santorum. Then Santorum could enter the future races with Newt's old support.
Rick Santorum could have won Ohio with the voters who voted for Perry and Huntsman. They stood on principle and gave Romney the win. How screwed up is that?
I know you mean well, but I think you've bought off on way too much of the anti-Santorum propaganda.
We could have develped much the same type of list about Newt, but we didn't want to operate that way. Besides, it was the forum policy not to.
16 posted on
03/07/2012 11:21:47 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
To: DoughtyOne
I repeat. Hillary made the same mistake Santorum has made.
18 posted on
03/07/2012 11:26:44 AM PST by
RitaOK
(LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
To: DoughtyOne
“Mitt only needs about 75 more delegates and he’s half way to the nomination.”
Please recheck your math Mittens is just over 400 delegates half of 1144 is 572.
There is also part of the Problem, Mittens has 80 Delegates that at least half belong to Newt and Santorum. Now whether the Convention adjust to the correct formula remains to be seen.
So it is between 170-220 for Mittens to reach half way point. And there is a ton of delegate states coming up that does not favor Mittens.
21 posted on
03/07/2012 11:45:47 AM PST by
Bailee
(Vote Newt the Pitt bull we need. Energy Independence and we bow to NO foreign dictator.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson