Replies

You are misinterpreting what Santorum said. He said he believed sex should occur in a committed and loving relationship, such as marriage, between a man and a woman.

He clearly stated that this was his personal belief. He never said the resources of the government should be wasted policing people who have sex outside marriage.

Go back and re read what I said, and you will see that I represented his view perfectly. Because I said exactly what you said.

Well, except, I used the words “for procreation” which is, um, exactly what RS said. But I went out of my way to mention the key point you were concerned about.

He clearly stated that this was his personal belief. He never said the resources of the government should be wasted policing people who have sex outside marriage.

Would for any ballsy candidate to follow up with clearly stating that the resources of the Federal government should have no part in policing people who peacefully turn away and exclude open homosexuals in their midst, refusing to employ them, serve them, rent to them, etc. By the same token, the Federal government should have no part in policing whether or not enclaves or communities do the opposite. The free market is a MAJOR component of being able to live morally in a free society.

Social conserviatives, UNDERSTAND that limited government is the best friend to living morally. We need someone who is as committed to slashing away government and returning it to the states on all levels, as he is to rejecting abortion and the homosexual agenda.

Godspeed Newt Gingrich.