Go back and re read what I said, and you will see that I represented his view perfectly. Because I said exactly what you said.
Well, except, I used the words “for procreation” which is, um, exactly what RS said. But I went out of my way to mention the key point you were concerned about.
You said “RS has made numerous statements in his political career about sex being for procreation only”
The MSM deliberately misreported Santorum’s statement to say he wants sex to be for procreation only. You have parroted the false narrative the MSM has spread. "Conjugal but also procreative" means what I said. "For procreation ONLY" means something very different.
You not only repeat the dishonesty of the elite media, you also copy their sarcasm and condescension.