Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: detective

Go back and re read what I said, and you will see that I represented his view perfectly. Because I said exactly what you said.

Well, except, I used the words “for procreation” which is, um, exactly what RS said. But I went out of my way to mention the key point you were concerned about.


41 posted on 03/05/2012 6:58:59 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright
Santorum said “it's a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be. They're supposed to be within marriage, for purposes that are, yes, conjugal ... but also procreative.”

You said “RS has made numerous statements in his political career about sex being for procreation only”

The MSM deliberately misreported Santorum’s statement to say he wants sex to be for procreation only. You have parroted the false narrative the MSM has spread. "Conjugal but also procreative" means what I said. "For procreation ONLY" means something very different.

You not only repeat the dishonesty of the elite media, you also copy their sarcasm and condescension.

50 posted on 03/05/2012 7:30:11 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson