Replies

You are 100% wrong. When you scan a document, by definition, it turns into a computer generated document. There can be few, or many of artifacts created in the process. If you enable OCR, you will get layers and all sorts of visual artifacts as the process will try and sharpen the image. You are falling for ignorant claims by people who are bot technologically literate. You can reproduce the artifacts yourself by installing the software and trying it.

Here is an example National Review put together, showing how a scanning to a pdf will create layers as seen in the obama cert.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/265767/pdf-layers-obamas-birth-certificate-nathan-goulding

Here is an example National Review put together, showing how a scanning to a pdf will create layers as seen in the obama cert. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/265767/pdf-layers-obamas-birth-certificate-nathan-goulding

Strange that the example in the cite has ONLY ONE layer unlike Obama's COLB posted by the White House.

Go look at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93cullaHRQc

or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1YdQ8uwxXQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgIMsSEAkYc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haiRCLItdEQ&feature=player_embedded How do you explain away the straight 'Male' and 'Kapiolani' as a software issue or other such nonsense? That one thing alone clearly indicates fake added material to Obama's COLB!!

No. Computer generated is where the document originated. that's why Hawaii calls their short form Certification of Live Birth a “computer generated’ document. Some of the data from the original BC is entered in to the computer and then an abstract of some of the birth information is printed out from the computer. Totally different than taking an original 1961 document, making a photocopy of it and then scanning that photocopy in to the computer. It did not originate in the computer and was not created in the computer it was simply scanned in to the computer. No comparison. OCR and optimization don't explain away any of the many forgery identifiers in the document posted on the White House website. it is a flat out forgery. national Review did not duplicate was you find on Obamas document and they had to acknowledge that you don't get that kind of layering from simply scanning a photocopy. So, go watch the many excellent tutorials on this. But it would be easier for you to just admit that the document is computer generated and created and that it is not a scanned photocopy. This in and of itself proves that it is not what B.O. said it was.