Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Hmm. That’s quite a list. I presume you are saying that somehow the state co-chair of the Gingrich campaign was unaware of that list, and so made this decision in ignorance? That would seem rather hard to believe.

Why do YOU think that a guy who was on the Gingrich team, and was co-chair of a state campaign, would abandon Gingrich when Santorum is dropping in the polls, and GIngrich is rising? Does he just hate backing a winner?

Participate in the actual conversation. DOn’t just keep spamming threads.


8 posted on 03/03/2012 12:30:35 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

DOn’t just keep spamming threads.

***********

Glad to hear you say that, Charles. Couldn’t agree more.


10 posted on 03/03/2012 12:34:13 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I wonder what you think about this, Charles. Isn't it a little difficult to apply the adjective "principled" to someone who does something like this?

Pious 2



24 posted on 03/03/2012 12:49:20 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
"Hmm. That’s quite a list. I presume you are saying that somehow the state co-chair of the Gingrich campaign was unaware of that list, and so made this decision in ignorance? That would seem rather hard to believe."

Some things are not explainable.. Is Mark Levin ignorant of these facts when he's backing Santorum?

Our BEST chance is GINGRICH/WEST!!!!

26 posted on 03/03/2012 12:50:23 PM PST by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT; skeeter

He has been posting that load of crap on the forum for weeks now. Now he has quit pasting the link to where he gets the information from. Evidently he did this, because I used them to find out that those charges are VERY problematic.

Here’s one instance:

Bankruptcy

Voted for a Schumer amendment to make the debts of pro-life demonstrators not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

The record here shows that Santorum signed a bill that did not allow pro-life demonstratores “WHO DERIVED DEBT FROM COMMITTING ACTS OF VIOLENCE” from discharging this debt via bankruptcy.

Antoherwords, if they bombed an abortion clinic, torched a car, shot someone dead, caused serious injury to someone, they would not be able to file bankruptcy and avoid having to be financially responsible for what they had done.

This bill DID NOT stop these people from discharging their other non-related to violence debt, if they qualified under normal circumstances.

This charge is VERY misleading.

I notified PsychoFreep that this was the case, and yet, there it is still being cast out across the forum to slander Santorum.

I think that speaks volumes about what is going on here.


150 posted on 03/04/2012 9:09:37 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson