This is sure entertaining..........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: Sub-Driver
So they want to shut down Rush for calling an ugly broad a “slut” but are totally fine with Muslims stoning, imprisoning and killing women who are raped by family members... got it...
2 posted on
03/02/2012 1:39:24 PM PST by
Wyatt's Torch
(I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
To: Sub-Driver
>>>> he has been identified time and time again as a lead strategist in the Republican party, not to mention a king-maker and an enforcer<<<<
That accounts for Romney and McCain, certainly. I sense a little perimenopausal confusion going on at the NOW offices.
3 posted on
03/02/2012 1:39:33 PM PST by
redpoll
To: Sub-Driver
The Nags have taken the bait.
4 posted on
03/02/2012 1:40:20 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Sub-Driver
mmmmmmm, I always thought the left considered Rush nothing but a simple entertainer. This seems like an awful lot of fuss over some simple entertainer now doesn’t it?
5 posted on
03/02/2012 1:40:40 PM PST by
cubreporter
(Happy New Year R ush and we look forward to 2012 with you and the EIB Microphone.)
To: Sub-Driver
And they are an open-minded, tolerant, diverse and unbiased group, too. Look out Rush. /sarc.
To: Sub-Driver
How many showed up in Boston at the NOW convention? Like 200?
7 posted on
03/02/2012 1:41:33 PM PST by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Sub-Driver
There they go again..giving the titular head of the Republican Party back to Rush! So where does this leave Colin Powell? Totally irrelevant?
To: Sub-Driver
I’m sure these a-holes were all over the SOB Bill Maher calling Sarah Palin the c-word./s
9 posted on
03/02/2012 1:42:29 PM PST by
Marathoner
(In the 80s we had Reagan, Johnny Cash and Bob Hope. Now we have Obama, no cash and no hope.)
To: Sub-Driver
WOW, it took NOW what, two seconds to demand Rush get pulled off the air, yet it took them a WEEK to demand some half ass apology from Bill Maher for calling Sarah Palin a cunt..and Maher NEVER apologized..and even when NOW demanded this half ass apology they trashed her while doing it..Hey NOW, you SUCK..this 30 year old woman is a whore, perhaps she should stop using her beaver so much, God didn’t intend for it to be used like that
To: Sub-Driver
11 posted on
03/02/2012 1:43:09 PM PST by
onyx
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
To: Sub-Driver
They never learn, this will give Rush an excuse to raise his ad rates again!
13 posted on
03/02/2012 1:43:59 PM PST by
bigbob
To: Sub-Driver
Ah, the jihadis scream and shout again.
14 posted on
03/02/2012 1:44:15 PM PST by
bboop
(Without justice, what else is the State but a great band of robbers? St. Augustine)
To: Sub-Driver
Where have the Nags been when the likes of Condoleeza Rice, Sarah Palin, and Michele Bachmann are being savaged by their leftist allies in the media and the ‘Rat party? Womyn is thy name, hypocrisy!
To: Sub-Driver
Are they also asking for the plug to be pulled on the State-Run-Media? David Letterman? Bill Mahr?
Those latter 3 had no "Phone Call of Support to the victim" when they trashed Sarah Palin (and her Family) for about 4 years, 24/7, and the latter two used derogatory vulgar terms, too.
No hypocrisy here, though....just move along.
17 posted on
03/02/2012 1:45:17 PM PST by
traditional1
(Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
To: Sub-Driver
Brings in the “Nappy headed Ho's” thingie.
But they won't stop Rush from keeping his job. If that were the case, then Billy Boy Maher would also have to go off the air. The first amendment has it covered.
18 posted on
03/02/2012 1:45:32 PM PST by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: Sub-Driver
The fact that this man has so much power in one of the two dominant political parties in the United States is shameful.
Are they talking about Limbaugh or Obama?
To: Sub-Driver
You know this stuff makes Romney nervous, while Newt would join Rush in condemning the idea that somehow the rest of us must foot the bill for somebody else’s good time.
To: Sub-Driver
It would be difficult to imagine Rush being able to say anything that could be half so demeaning to American womanhood as the ongoing disparaging of femininity, which has been NOW's stock-in-trade. My article on
Women Hostage To Contrived Delusion, largely had the NOW types in mind.
If the not so dears at NOW actually cared about real women, they would radically alter the causes they embrace, and start honoring the traditional feminine traits, which decent & normal men have always honored. The idea that the sexes are somehow competing interest groups, rather than the two essential components of human continuity & purpose, is totally indefensible in logic--and a terrible detriment to human happiness.
William Flax
22 posted on
03/02/2012 1:49:18 PM PST by
Ohioan
To: Sub-Driver
Mark my words: Monday, Rush will go after the NAGs and play the “credibility card” on them - telling them they have a leg to stand on after they’ve called on HBO to sh|t-can Maher’s show... and when they’ve called on pMSNBC to fire any arseportal who’s uttered “tea bagger”... shall I go on??
23 posted on
03/02/2012 1:49:18 PM PST by
Keith in Iowa
(Willard Romney, purveyor of the world's finest bullmitt. | FR Class of 1998 |)
To: Sub-Driver
but calling her a 'slut' and a 'prostitute' on air is unacceptable.ROTFLMAO!
![Photobucket](http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk285/rackitt/944a47cd.jpg)
24 posted on
03/02/2012 1:50:09 PM PST by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson