Posted on 03/02/2012 10:07:46 AM PST by South40
The ongoing debate over birth control took a particularly nasty turn recently when conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh called Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” and “prostitute” for speaking out about the issue.
Fluke, a birth control activist, spoke with TODAY’s Matt Lauer about Limbaugh’s comments and the failure of a GOP-sponsored amendment that would have allowed employers at religious institutions to opt out of providing contraception in health plans.
(Excerpt) Read more at todayonthetrail.today.msnbc.msn.com ...
President Clinton?
Skank would have been a better word to use.
Repost:
Open letter to Nancy Pelosi...
Madam Congresswoman,
A woman who arranges for a person to pay another person to engage in a sex act is often called a Madam.
Sincerely,
NOMW
I just couldn’t bring myself to comment on fb, deaf ears and blind guides comes to mind.
LOL...seriously laughing out loud here!
YET BEING CALLLED A TEA BAGGER O.K.? good grief I call BS on this. She knew she was going to get grief, it is all part of the plan...
butbutbutbut that’s sexist! they never call a pimp a “sir” do they?
Where does she find the time for classes? What the hell is her major anyway?....Slutology?
lol!!!!
LOL!
Here’s the real kicker with this woman’s BS. She claims that she uses birth control pills but she has so much sex it costs her too much to buy them. This is a crock. One pack of BC pills per month, one pill per day, regardless of how many guys she has sticking it to her in that month. It costs the same. This is just one of the many lies that lefties tell to try and get sympathy for their idiotic causes. Rush was right to call her a slut, she labeled her self as a slut out of her own mouth and I hope Rush points this out today or at least next week. Any woman who says she has sex on a massive scale and is not married is, by definition, a slut, whore or whatever name you can think to call her. Any woman that wants to be paid for having sex, even if it is in the form of free BC pills, is a prostitute.
Outraged??? The taxpayers who would foot the bill for her excessive sex drive (her own admission) are the ones who should be outraged.
The worthless slut can screw all she wants and buy all of the birth control she wants on her time and her dime. The rest of us have no obligation to support her sex/prostitution habits.
Aside from that, if birth control pills at worst, cost her $30 a month then her cost of BC would be $360 which is far from $3000. So, if she is spending the other $2640 on condoms then assuming an average cost of $10 for a box of 12 premium condoms then she’s buying 264 boxes of 12 which spread (pardon the reference) over 12 months then that is approximately 264 condoms a month or 8.8 condoms per day.
Wow! That really is a lot of sex, more than most prostitutes would put up with for a single day much less every day.
Now that her name and institution is out there, how long before her address is out there and the phone calls and long lines of men start forming to help her use all of those condoms?
She is a self-described slut who is pandering to the taxpayer to “pay” for her habits; thus fitting the label of prostitute.
I think it is time for the press to take this to the next level and interview her parents so they can express solidarity with her and tell us all how happy they are that she is getting laid so much.
Must be lots of tranny chasers in NW.
If they are going to force the public to pay to prevent conception or end life...are they also going to pay for fertility treatment to conceive and start life?
You’re a BRAVE Man!
For the pills to operate as intended you can’t just pop one when you have the headache like an aspirin. Maybe she hoped to economize?
“Well, I never—”
[groucho]
If you nevah—then why do you spend a grand a year on boith control?
[/groucho]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.