When Romney is the Nominee.....? (VANITY)

FreeRepublic.com ^ | March 2, 2012 | noredtape

[Kazan]

Why do you trust Obama so much?

Wrong question! I trust Republicans a whole lot more when a liberal Democrat is in the White House than when a RINO Republican is.

Even many conservatives caved with Bush in the White House on spending and Bush is nowhere near as liberal as Romney.

With a Democrat in the White House, Republicans will at least be motivated to oppose liberal policies in order to get reelected and increase their hold on Congress.

[davisfh]

If you want more “crappy, evil things” then just make a political maneuver that will continue Barack Obama in office. That maneuver may satisfy you will bring the United States of America to its final destruction.

[tellw]

1). Vote for Romney to oust Obama. I do not want to see leftists dancing in the streets for a Presidential victory ever again.

[SoConPubbie]

If you want more “crappy, evil things” then just make a political maneuver that will continue Barack Obama in office. That maneuver may satisfy you will bring the United States of America to its final destruction.

Only God himself knows if that is the truth.

You don't have a crystal ball and neither do I.

However, both you and I can see the historical past and Mitt Romney's historical past includes the following Progressive Liberal Behavior:

1. Supported Abortion while Govenor of MA.
2. Supported the Gay Agenda, including Gay Marriage, while Govenor of MA.
3. Supported and implemented the Assault Weapons Ban at the state level in MA.
4. Implemented the Socialistic RomneyCare with it's Individual Mandate.
5. Supported TARP.
6. Supported the Auto Bailouts
7. Supported and believed in Global Warming.
8. Does not support reinstating Don't ASK Don't Tell


And this is by no means a complete list, so to re-iterate, you supporting a Progressive Liberal, while slightly to the right of the current Progressive Liberal has only one inescapable conclusion, FAILURE.

Why do you think the media and Obama have held their fire on Mitt Romney?

They are totally aware of his Progressive Liberalism.

They will utterly and completely destroy Mitt Romney in the general election.

His loss will make McCain's loss look like a bona-fide win.

His record is way to the left of McCain's.

Yes, if Romney is nominated, it is a "Crappy, and evil thins" and nothing good will come from it.

Nothing.

[davisfh]

And if Obama is re-elected because of your actions and the actions of others who vote for another Ross Perot?

[SoConPubbie]

And if Obama is re-elected because of your actions and the actions of others who vote for another Ross Perot?

No, it won't be the result of my actions or anyone else who is honoring their principles and refusing to vote for Candidate A (Democrat) or Candidate B (Republican) who are both Progressive Liberals.

It will be the fault of those who did not take their voting responsibility seriously enough to inform themselves concerning the actual history of Mitt Romney.

It will be the fault of those who did not take their principles seriously enough and chose to compromise their values and principles and believe the false propaganda that only Romney is electable or that the GOP has to run to the center to win elections.

In short, the same people trying to blame actual conservatives, you know, like yourself, because they won't listen to the GOP-E pied-piper anymore with their message that even though our guy is a Progressive Liberal, he isn't as bad as the other guy. Don't blame me

[sand lake bar]

” I won’t be voting for Romney myself, but do I expect that the political leaders of the GOP would back the nominee no matter how much they disrespect him, yes.”

Well, one point is that these people all see a clear difference between Romney and Obama.

[GenXteacher]

“Well, one point is that these people all see a clear difference between Romney and Obama.”

Then those people do not see very well. Both are liberals who will say whatever it takes to get elected, then govern to the left.

[ansel12]

The major point is that the GOP-e wants to keep America moving left, just like the rest of the left does.

[sand lake bar]

Including Sarah and the others who you agree will support Mitt if he wins?

[ansel12]

You are one of those supporting Romney in the primary.

That puts you on the list as a weak, liberal, freeper.

Being against conservatism, makes you a bad American.

[sand lake bar]

You can’t answer my question, can you? It would spoil your dogma. Thanks for the laughs.

[glennaro]

I am done voting for liberals masquerading as conservatives. Got it? DONE! If you want my vote, run a conservative

I got it ... I understand what you're saying ... and I think you are wrong in your thinking and in your plan to effectively help support Obama's re-election if the only realistic alternative is a RINO. Those who love America, the Constitution and traditional American values (as I am sure you do, as do I and as do all conservatives) must not do anything to support the current socialist president and his persistent efforts to destroy (i.e., "fundamentally change") the very things conservatism stands for.

While arguing over who is the best (in terms of conservative values) alternative to the socialist president is essential to preserving those values, that battle must be fought in the primaries ... not in the general election where, if we don't win, socialism and the resulting loss of liberty will prevail.

My friend (and I truly mean that), I hope that when the time comes, when you're in the voting booth or sitting at your kitchen table filling out your ballot, you will see the urgency -- the essential need -- to turn America from socialism even though we may not have the "best" conservative alternative available to do so, and not let your disappointment and frustration outweigh your responsibility to help defeat Obama.

[ansel12]

Do I think that party professionals will stay in the party and not go third party? Of course.

Now tell us how you are not a weak liberal for trying to push Romney in the primary,what “dogma” led you to freerepublic to promote liberalism?

[citizen]

I will do what my tagline says.

[sand lake bar]

Your mom

[ansel12]

LOL, you are definitely a Romney voter.

[GOYAKLA]

If Romney is the GOP candidate, Las Vegas calls that a ‘Push’!
Either way the wheels that are wobbling for this country now will be coming off the next four years.
This country and it’s now both ruling parties have completely sold out “We the People”! The Constitution is being gutted everyday and not one politician has balls to change direction. We keep sending the same the same scurvy money grubbing, power hungry egotistical slime and, surprise, get the same results.
If my car was like this government I would run it in to a tree burn it and get a new one.
We are at fault thinking these politicians of today are like the ones in 1773-78.
Lots of luck to the USA!

[Antoninus]

I hope that when the time comes, when you're in the voting booth or sitting at your kitchen table filling out your ballot, you will see the urgency -- the essential need -- to turn America from socialism

We don't do that be voting for a northeastern liberal elite with an (R) after his name. And that's what Mitt Romney is. If he's the nominee, I will leave the party and work to take as many people as I can with me--because there won't be an opposition party to socialism left in this country at that point.

[Kevmo]

We don’t do that be voting for a northeastern liberal elite with an (R) after his name. And that’s what Mitt Romney is. If he’s the nominee, I will leave the party and work to take as many people as I can with me—because there won’t be an opposition party to socialism left in this country at that point.
***I see it differently. I won’t vote for Mitt, but I will vote a straight R ticket. I’ll just write in my favorite republican on the top slot. Straight Republican, all the way.