Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five reasons why Mitt Romney’s Michigan and Arizona wins are a big deal
SFGate: Politics Blog ^ | 2/28/12 | Richard Dunham, Hearst Washington Bureau

Posted on 02/28/2012 9:31:06 PM PST by SmithL

We’ve been reading for weeks about Mitt Romney’s demise as a presidential candidate.

For a candidate who’s been declared dead more often than Mark Twain, he’s showing surprising life.

In his victory speech in suburban Detroit, the Michigan native called his twin victories “a giant step toward a brighter future.”

Here are five reasons why the former Massachusetts governor’s wins in Michigan and Arizona are significant:

1. Considering how many mistakes Romney has made, he still won.

It was a rough week with a bushel of bad press. Remember the trees being the right size. And the multiple Cadillacs in the family garage. He still won.

2. He is resilient.

Romney dug himself a hole in Michigan. He was trailing in the polls. And he came from behind. If he’s going to beat President Obama, he’ll need to follow that same path.

3. His negative ads have been effective.

He outspent rival Rick Santorum and buried him with a barrage of negative ads. Santorum damaged himself with a weak debate performance in Arizona and a couple of campaign-trail gaffes. But Romney proved — once again — that he can shape public images of his rivals through skillful attack ads. Barack Obama: beware.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: election2012; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
The media is gonna love him, right until he gets the nomination.
1 posted on 02/28/2012 9:31:09 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

He will never go after Obama like he has the Republican candidates. I bet he calls him a decent man and shares a beer with him.


2 posted on 02/28/2012 9:34:27 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather (Ron Paul and Romney in alliance to take out the conservatives in this election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Michigan Republican Delegate count Santorum 13 - Romney 15 - 2 available - http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/MI-R


3 posted on 02/28/2012 9:35:35 PM PST by Fred (http://whenmittromneycametotown.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I didn’t read 4 and 5 was either one that he gives a good speech? Because he does. Santorum sadly does not. Newt is pretty good but he comes and goes. Ron Paul speaks with the conviction of a zealot but ....


4 posted on 02/28/2012 9:36:25 PM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
It's 2008 all over again.

Again, the msm has picked our candidate - John McCain II - in the form of mitt romney.

It is pathetic.
5 posted on 02/28/2012 9:36:57 PM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Romney will become a scared dog against Obama. The tactics he is using will not work against someone who has 5x the money and a sleze machine that makes Romney’s look like amateur hour.


6 posted on 02/28/2012 9:37:33 PM PST by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Yep, we lose again...there’s not much difference between the two.............sigh


7 posted on 02/28/2012 9:39:57 PM PST by PeachyKeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Mark Twain was only declared dead once, IIRC.


8 posted on 02/28/2012 9:40:20 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

Mitt is not my fav, but McCain was a horrible candidate. He looked terribly old in 2000: At least Mitt is telegenic.


9 posted on 02/28/2012 9:44:40 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Williams
I didn’t read 4 and 5 was either one that he gives a good speech? Because he does. Santorum sadly does not. Newt is pretty good but he comes and goes. Ron Paul speaks with the conviction of a zealot but ....

Still pimpin' that Progressive Liberal Romney, I see.
10 posted on 02/28/2012 9:49:33 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Yep, they’ll destroy him as a cult polygamist incarcerator and for his record of saying things about Corporations being people, when they are the hallmark of image of conformity business.


11 posted on 02/28/2012 10:02:12 PM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
At least Mitt is telegenic.

And, unlike McCain, when Mitt insults the base, it's not intentional; it's by accident.

12 posted on 02/28/2012 10:04:53 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

well, I guess there’s nothing like having a “pretty president”...huh?


13 posted on 02/28/2012 10:06:28 PM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Thanks for mentioning Obama’s money. The linked article praises Mitt’s allegedly skillful ads but all he did (to Gingrich and now to Santorum) was bury them under a money advantage.

If he’s the nominee he’ll find out what being buried feels like.


14 posted on 02/28/2012 10:07:22 PM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
(Article)
....he can shape public images of his rivals through skillful attack ads. Barack Obama: beware.

Oh, yeah, Barky and the LSM are just shaking in their boots, lol.

This is like watching people shoot kittens in a barrel.

15 posted on 02/28/2012 10:07:30 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

And he smiles so sweetly when he insults...we just misunderstand.


16 posted on 02/28/2012 10:08:36 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
It's 2008 all over again.

It's worse.

17 posted on 02/28/2012 10:10:48 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

“He will never go after Obama like he has the Republican candidates. I bet he calls him a decent man and shares a beer with him.”

You betcha - Juan McCain all over again. And Santorum won’t have the cajones (or the poise) to pull it off either. This is just sickening.

Newt is the ONLY one who can face off utterly, fearlessly and effectively against the SOB in Chief. It kills me how smug (and WRONG!) all the GOP elites and “conservative” pundits are about Romney and his supposed electability. When he loses to BHO, they’ll be clueless but have all kinds of excuses why.


18 posted on 02/28/2012 10:13:48 PM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

For all those that so intently contributed to the Circular Firing Squad here you are now free to have your own circle jerk, you should take deep pride in you roll in helpking kill the Republic, you get to live in it.

Me, I am old, to old to care anymore.


19 posted on 02/28/2012 10:18:20 PM PST by itsahoot (Much easier to tear down a building, than to build one. Bigger mess though.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

“He looked terribly old in 2000: At least Mitt is telegenic.”

And it’s that kind of deep thinking that reflects all the voters who’re saddling us with BHO Lite - Mittens Obomney.


20 posted on 02/28/2012 10:24:02 PM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson