[lentulusgracchus]

(Article) (font color="forestgreen">Watching Rick Santorum ... is like watching the sequel of a horror movie — one I literally lived through in the 1980s while growing up in Pakistan. ... religious zealot, Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, played the lead role of the real Muslim.

You've posted articles like this twice today. This one is on Christians participating in politics, by a Mohammedan Islamist. The other one was a Richard Cohen hit-piece against Santorum for basically not being okay with gay and willing to "flex" on abortion and other irrelevant, non-presidential, out-of-bounds issues.

So what is the point of posting these guys, presidio9 ..... unless you think Christian social conservatives are the moral equivalent of Taliban, and are

RELIGIOUS BIGOTS AND FANATICS
who want to
BURN EVERYBODY AT THE STAKE

..... and you want to see them excluded 100% from public life pro bono? Come on, step up. Man up, and quit chipping little snarky chipshots (using borrowed voices, Newsweak-style) from the sidelines. Spit it out -- RELIGION IS BAD, 'ngkay? And religious people need to be cast out, got rid of. Yes? Maybe disenfranchised by a test of their religious "suitability" for presenting to the secularizing public? Locked in the national attic like a crazy uncle?

Talk to us. Signify.

[presidio9]

I strongly disagree with about 90% of the threads that I post to FR. I read FR for the responses, and I learn most of what I know there. I live and work in the NYC area. For the past 13 years I have relied on FR to help me counter every ridiculous point the liberals I am constantly surrounded come up with.

What's interesting about reading or responding to a thread that everyone here on FR agrees with? I you have a problem with that, the great thing about the internet (and this country in general) is that you can exercise your right not to read it.