[Steelfish]

Before impugning integrity, why the heck don’t you check Gallup and the slew of articles and commentaries on Gingrich’s unbridgeable gender gap?

http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/gingrich-destroyed-by-gender-gap/

Bush beat Gore and Kerry with 10-12 points gender gap.
http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/research/topics/documents/GenderGapAdvisory04.pdf

A 25-point gender gap in FL and now a 39-point gender gap in the recent Gallup is of historic proportions and this puts Gingrich completely and irrevocably out of contention regardless of what happens on Tuesday.

[JediJones]

What your link shows me is I should have impugned your math more than your integrity. Unless you want to show me a poll where a mythical "39-point gender gap" exists for Newt. The quote about Bush/Gore from your link says there is a 10-point gender gap because 53% of men voted Bush while only 43% of women did. In the latest Gallup demographic data I can find (2/13-2/19), Newt has 15% from men and 12% from women, giving him a 3-POINT gender gap. You are going to have to provide further evidence for your 39-point gap claim. You seem to be badly misreading the data.

I will also add that solely focusing on the Florida results as in Dick Morris' article is just silly. Newt WON the women's vote in South Carolina as I recall. So you're taking a vote that occurred on one day in one state. It hardly defines the character of the entire race or what the general election will look like.

There has been a gender gap in every presidential election since 1980. In the 2000 election, women were 10 percentage points less likely than men to vote for George W. Bush (43% of women vs. 53% of men supported Bush); and 12 percentage points more likely than men to vote for Al Gore (54% of women vs. 42% of men supported Gore), according to the Voter News Service.