[JediJones]

What your link shows me is I should have impugned your math more than your integrity. Unless you want to show me a poll where a mythical "39-point gender gap" exists for Newt. The quote about Bush/Gore from your link says there is a 10-point gender gap because 53% of men voted Bush while only 43% of women did. In the latest Gallup demographic data I can find (2/13-2/19), Newt has 15% from men and 12% from women, giving him a 3-POINT gender gap. You are going to have to provide further evidence for your 39-point gap claim. You seem to be badly misreading the data.

I will also add that solely focusing on the Florida results as in Dick Morris' article is just silly. Newt WON the women's vote in South Carolina as I recall. So you're taking a vote that occurred on one day in one state. It hardly defines the character of the entire race or what the general election will look like.

There has been a gender gap in every presidential election since 1980. In the 2000 election, women were 10 percentage points less likely than men to vote for George W. Bush (43% of women vs. 53% of men supported Bush); and 12 percentage points more likely than men to vote for Al Gore (54% of women vs. 42% of men supported Gore), according to the Voter News Service.

[Steelfish]

I was referring to the latest ARG poll (misspoke by calling it Gallup-apologies) posted on Feb 25, 2012

It’s not the difference in gender for those voting for Gingrich. You need to examine the gender divide between Gingrich and the other two viable candidates in the race.

http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/