I don’t see any ideological fidelity from any of them.
Newt and Paul seem o be closest to that, but Paul is just a raving nut on so many matters.
Ricky and Mitt seem like intellectual chameleons to me.
From one of the contraception/blood clots sites of 2.4 million links
A new study has shown that women who use new type of contraceptive pills are twice as likely to develop life threatening blood clots as those who take older versions. Oral hormonal contraceptives have been known to increase the risk of a blood clot in deep leg veins, known as venous thromboembolism (VTE). These can prove fatal if they travel to the lungs. But, researchers at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, found the “third-generation” pills are doubly harmful than the older versions
Pfft - 20 more lashes for saying Paul.....
I could go on and on about Paul’s history...but really it’s pointless and you already have seen how nutty he is.
If you think Noot didn’t participate in any sort of behind the scenes dealing like Santorum described, you’d be wrong - as Speaker of the House, he was one twisting the arms, not having his arm twisted, but either way, it’s one and the same as far as I am concerned.
All I know is, while I may have to end up voting for Noot, I won’t be happy about it. It’s as if he and Mitt try to outdo each other daily on who can turn me off the quickest or anger me the most with their inanities and ridiculous statements.
Ultimately, though, I’m not thrilled with any of these guys. Four years of planning and this is the best we could do? There wasn’t anyone who really thrilled me. But if I had a choice, I’d chose Santorum today out of the four. Noot is second, Mittens third, Paul is a no go. When Obumma’s foreign policy is stronger than your’s, then you won’t get my vote end of story.