To: no dems
I am not a Santorum supporter, but I’d have much more respect for him if he’d explain his Specter endorsement like you just did: “Look, the guy endorsed me so I returned the favor.” He sounded a little disingenuous in the debate trying to explain it was all about future judges.
To: Mangia E Statti Zitto
He sounded a little disingenuous in the debate trying to explain it was all about future judges.
Given that Specter was heading the Senate Judiciary Committee, and is a pro-abort, he could have EASILY spiked a Roberts or an Alito. I find the explanation more than plausible, given Santorum's priorities (pro-life, etc.)
13 posted on
02/24/2012 4:50:44 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(May Mitt Romney be the Paul Tsongas of 2012.)
To: Mangia E Statti Zitto; All
He sounded a little disingenuous in the debate trying to explain it was all about future judges ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Actually, I thought that explanation made sense. Specter did vote for Roberts and Alito to be confirmed. One good thing folks ONLY 4 MILLION PEOPLE WATCHED THE DEBATE WEDNESDAY NIGHT......THANK GOD!!!
42 posted on
02/24/2012 8:51:09 AM PST by
no dems
(Hold the excitement: A Brokered Convention would give us Mitt RINO-Rom as our nominee; guaranteed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson