Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

So it only takes out the electronics in the eastern half of the US. wow big improvement

I’m not worried about the USSR or even China, they aren’t going to do it. Iran, Pakistan or another country with a limited supply of nukes may see this as a way of striking the US.

People like Iran want Armageddon.


107 posted on 02/23/2012 10:05:47 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver; discostu

Hell the border is so porous al-Qaeda could just drive one across the border in a Tijuana Taxi!


115 posted on 02/23/2012 10:12:22 AM PST by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver

To “only” take out the electronics on the eastern half they still need to increase the size of their payload that they’re getting to that altitude by about 20 fold. Quite a few serious jumps in their technology.

If they want armageddon the best bang for the buck is ground nukes. Cheaper, easier to transport (heck you can ship them in here if you can forge documents), much more destructive. The more limited your supply of nukes the more reason there is to NOT waste any on a silly assed high altitude EMP. Putting one in a truck next to the bull on Wall Street will kill more people with less effort lower traceability and lower failure rate.


119 posted on 02/23/2012 10:13:49 AM PST by discostu (I did it 35 minutes ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson