Posted on 02/23/2012 8:43:56 AM PST by Biggirl
Ron Paul hasn’t accomplished anything other than inserting millions of dollars worth of earmarks for things like the “Reading is Elementary” program, and the Coastal highways in over 20 years in Congress. He’s definitely going to get something accomplished as President. Well, Presidents can request earmarks, so . . .
I didn’t ask you if you think that Americans are anti-Mormon, I asked you if voters that are unwilling to vote for a man who talks about Satan and evil, would be any more likely to vote for a man who wears long underwear to protect his bodily orifices from evil spirits?
What’s your guess?
I go away for two days and the Paulistinians take over....
and apparently a Pharisee or two, too.
you are weird. a war against sensuality? are you still looking for that one special girl robot?
You Nootardz are a funny bunch, classic “change the subject and attack” just like liberals do. Sad because I know you aren’t a liberal yet you employ their tactics like Newt despicably did to that POS Mittens. Santorum is now a Pharisee? LMAO! So you want to cite famous adulterers in the Bible to justify Newt’s adultery and “open marriage”? That’s funny.
Don’t worry cupcake, I’ll vote for Newt if or when he wins the primary. But for now I’ll stick with the common sense candidate who breaks the least 10 Commandments.
And FWIW Newt was AWESOME calling out John King for not reporting 0bama’s abortion survivor murder vote. I love his debating skills but I can’t forgive him here on earth, that is God’s job in the everlasting. Till then there are 10 rules.
for me - its a problem that his first attack on jonjon was a LIE - noot did NOT offer abc news friends to back up his story
Tis true but I'm still voting for the serial adulterer if he wins the primary. Till then I'm voting for the most electable conservative.
I apparently over estimated your ability to follow along what I was doing. You were the holier than thou prig who proudly claimed to know what God would have you do and then gave your specious reasoning for doing it.
I simply, in the hypothetical, used God’s history to show you that you might have been over reaching on your theory just a tad. You used the Bible to justify supporting Santorum, and I simply showed the potential flaw in your reasoning.
That’s not at all a change the subject. I was on your subject. And I used logic and history and the Bible to put forth a far superior argument than you did.
And I was not justifying anything Newt has done. I was again showing that God has often used folks with many flaws similar to Newt’s for His great purposes.
But again, you have shown yourself not able to follow a logical argument, so I assume I left you again in this one.
Good Morning.
Thank-you for letting me know.
I forgot about the fact that gay marriage could open the door for polygamy with a Mormon president, who speaks openly about his polygamous grandfather.
Then there is that movement in AZ, to blame the Mormons for some anti-Hispanic legislation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.