You Nootardz are a funny bunch, classic “change the subject and attack” just like liberals do. Sad because I know you aren’t a liberal yet you employ their tactics like Newt despicably did to that POS Mittens. Santorum is now a Pharisee? LMAO! So you want to cite famous adulterers in the Bible to justify Newt’s adultery and “open marriage”? That’s funny.
Don’t worry cupcake, I’ll vote for Newt if or when he wins the primary. But for now I’ll stick with the common sense candidate who breaks the least 10 Commandments.
And FWIW Newt was AWESOME calling out John King for not reporting 0bama’s abortion survivor murder vote. I love his debating skills but I can’t forgive him here on earth, that is God’s job in the everlasting. Till then there are 10 rules.
for me - its a problem that his first attack on jonjon was a LIE - noot did NOT offer abc news friends to back up his story
I apparently over estimated your ability to follow along what I was doing. You were the holier than thou prig who proudly claimed to know what God would have you do and then gave your specious reasoning for doing it.
I simply, in the hypothetical, used God’s history to show you that you might have been over reaching on your theory just a tad. You used the Bible to justify supporting Santorum, and I simply showed the potential flaw in your reasoning.
That’s not at all a change the subject. I was on your subject. And I used logic and history and the Bible to put forth a far superior argument than you did.
And I was not justifying anything Newt has done. I was again showing that God has often used folks with many flaws similar to Newt’s for His great purposes.
But again, you have shown yourself not able to follow a logical argument, so I assume I left you again in this one.