Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12PM-3PM,EST,WABC AM, February 23, 2012
The EIB Network ^ | February 23,2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 02/23/2012 8:43:56 AM PST by Biggirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-311 next last
To: CSM

this woman is showing herself to be a lib, and ignorant and embarrassing


121 posted on 02/23/2012 10:47:03 AM PST by jenk (The country needs Sarah Palin and the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

Haven’t seen him this mad in a long time.


122 posted on 02/23/2012 10:47:12 AM PST by commonguymd (Freedom is a myth anymore it seems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Lucky!?! Only if you are going for the Bingo games;)

Ninety eight percent would include just about every Catholic female, over the age of twelve and not in their tenth year of nursing home care.

What is it? Another idiot Rombot.


123 posted on 02/23/2012 10:47:12 AM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (Just because you are paranoid it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

Go git her Rush!


124 posted on 02/23/2012 10:47:19 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: PogySailor
strange that she can read all this crap into something with the gop candidates

but can't understand the plain spoken words of the righteous ‘reverend’ wright

hey, fool - the middle east is on fire

the economy is in the crapper

stop worrying about your right to screw - no one is talking about taking it away

stop allowing me to control you with my ‘judgment’ - you fear the wrong things

125 posted on 02/23/2012 10:47:45 AM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Thank you, Rush! That woman was ignorant and embarassing!


126 posted on 02/23/2012 10:48:22 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: CSM

I love it when he goes off like this!

:-)


127 posted on 02/23/2012 10:49:09 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: CSM

HOORAY FOR RUSH!


128 posted on 02/23/2012 10:49:14 AM PST by jenk (The country needs Sarah Palin and the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: CSM

You have to hand it to the Democrats. They took a huge embarrassment of overreach on their part—the HHS edict forcing contraception on religious institutions—and turned it around to get their unthinking female constituent base believing that the opposition to it means “those evil Republicans want to take away my birth control!!”


129 posted on 02/23/2012 10:49:26 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Be careful of believing something just because you want it to be true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: sloop

Snerdly must be on a bathroom break.

First a Romtard caller then a 0bama seminar caller.

Jeeze!


130 posted on 02/23/2012 10:49:38 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

I don’t know about you,
but I really felt like slapping
the arrogant, ignorant, condescending, better than you
tone right out of her mouth.

There’s no way that woman was anywhere near a “republican”.

Her tone was befitting of an NPR fan, to say the least.


131 posted on 02/23/2012 10:50:12 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Thank you, Rush.....that lady deserved that verbal smackdown.


132 posted on 02/23/2012 10:50:16 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Marathoner

What was with that false condescending tone she was using with him? She thought that would be effective with one of the most skilled talkers in radio history? What a dope!


133 posted on 02/23/2012 10:50:24 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sloop

These are the same fools that don’t realize that by passing Obamacare, with a federally mandated database for all medical records, has legislated away their supposed “privacy” established in Roe v Wade.

Bread and circuses for all! Yipee....


134 posted on 02/23/2012 10:50:55 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
rush, always gives 'em enough rope to hang themselves... delusional callers.

135 posted on 02/23/2012 10:50:55 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Simple: Kill the terrorists, Protect (all) the borders, ridicule all the (remaining) Liberals :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Rush’s response to this caller is so perfect. I love him.


136 posted on 02/23/2012 10:51:07 AM PST by Mrs. P (Figures can lie, and liars can figure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: All

Thanks for ripping that ignorant female caller a new one. She WAS an embarrassment!

Rick Santorum is running on the Constitutional platform of a SMALLER Federal Government.

Consequently, for the proponents of BIG Government (Leftists/DemocRATS) to accuse Santorum of wanting to “impose a theocracy” on the United States, is ludricrous on its face.

In fact, it is the ‘RATS who are guilty of attempting to do just that. Wasn’t it Obama who invoked the name of Jesus Christ, saying that He was in his corner in backing his proposed tax increases?

‘RATS know that one must have a BIG FEDERAL GOVERNMENT in order to cram a “theocracy” (or anything else...like OBAMACARE), down the throats of the American people.

That’s the argument Santorum needs to make in response to ‘RAT’S criticism on this issue, and others.


137 posted on 02/23/2012 10:51:07 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("Without consequences, there's no virtue". ~ Rush Limbaugh 12:51 PM, Friday, 2/17/2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: All

WSJ FEBRUARY 21, 2012
Sex, Lies and Rick Santorum
The politics of the double standard on social issues.
By WILLIAM MCGURN
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204909104577235471075318762.html


138 posted on 02/23/2012 10:52:54 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("Without consequences, there's no virtue". ~ Rush Limbaugh 12:51 PM, Friday, 2/17/2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Apparently you are very comfortable with the Presidential election being about sex and religion rather than about the economy and the exploding growth of government.


139 posted on 02/23/2012 10:53:30 AM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Parents!?!?!


140 posted on 02/23/2012 10:54:14 AM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (Just because you are paranoid it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson