Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36

If true, you should be embarrassed that a computer program can present more articulate and rational arguments then you can. Just saying.


318 posted on 02/26/2012 8:30:37 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]


To: Harlan1196
...a computer program can present more articulate and rational arguments then you can.
Think about it..."chatter" bot. No arguments are being presented, just chatter.

Like I said, it's just a theory at this point in time and I'll randomly test my theory again at some other inopportune time.

319 posted on 02/26/2012 9:19:36 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

To: Harlan1196
If true, you should be embarrassed that a computer program can present more articulate and rational arguments then you can. Just saying.

I'm sure a computer program COULD produce more articulate and rational arguments then can you. As of yet, you have produced none. A computer need reply with anything (including random text gibberish) to have bettered your effort.

At least gibberish wouldn't be absolutely wrong.

337 posted on 02/26/2012 10:04:49 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson