To: philman_36
If true, you should be embarrassed that a computer program can present more articulate and rational arguments then you can. Just saying.
To: Harlan1196
...a computer program can present more articulate and rational arguments then you can.Think about it..."chatter" bot. No arguments are being presented, just chatter.
Like I said, it's just a theory at this point in time and I'll randomly test my theory again at some other inopportune time.
319 posted on
02/26/2012 9:19:36 AM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Harlan1196
If true, you should be embarrassed that a computer program can present more articulate and rational arguments then you can. Just saying. I'm sure a computer program COULD produce more articulate and rational arguments then can you. As of yet, you have produced none. A computer need reply with anything (including random text gibberish) to have bettered your effort.
At least gibberish wouldn't be absolutely wrong.
337 posted on
02/26/2012 10:04:49 AM PST by
DiogenesLamp
(Partus Sequitur Patrem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson