Hey, then at least he and Soros will find themselves on the same side. And after all that tooting about wanting to oppose Soros’ financial levers.
Hey, then at least he and Soros will find themselves on the same side. And after all that tooting about wanting to oppose Soros’ financial leverage.
So Adelson gives money to Newt to Help Mittens. Mittens scorched earth left a bad taste in everyone mouth and his funds are drying up. Mittens went crying to Adelson looking for a hand out.
How much money did Adelson give Mittens. Nothing.
If mittens loses Michigan its over if he dont tap his own personal wealth.
Is this the Trump situation?
FFS, I read the post and then thought WTH is this about but then I saw it was you going on AGAIN against Newt.
Do you ever give it a rest for crying out loud?
Infact please do, it has become boring and tedious
__________________
You've “spammed” that same whacky theory about Adelson's support for Newt on several threads; however, a logical examination of the facts does not support it.
Why would it make any sense at all for Adelson to be contributing funds to Newt PAC's for the purpose of undermining both Newt and Santorum in order to help Romney??? That premise defies even the most basic application of logic.
Newt and Rick are both well documented enemies of Iran's nuclear ambitions and strong supporters of Israel; which are Adelson’s main reasons for contributing to any national political campaign. While you offer only some sort of vague, illogical “tinfoil” theory, Occam's Razor would imply that if Adelson’s desire was to help Romney; he could just cut off funding for Newt and give all his contributions directly to Romney's PAC. I'm sure they could find more than enough dirty tricks and attack ads to spend it on.
Further, after examining your posting history, the majority of your recent posts are either anti-Newt w/allegations you do not substantiate; or awkward accusations that Christians are being attacked on FR. I would add that, your posts also contained a plaintive plea to Jim; whining that he had “promised” you that he would not ban you from FR. While I seriously doubt Jim makes any such “promises” to you or anyone else; what is clear is that others must have complained about your nefarious posting tactics for you to have made such a whimpering appeal!!!
Frankly, I find your tactics less than honest. To that point I submit the following: Recently on another thread you posted a comment addressed to me regarding the same theory you “spammed” on this thread. Because I had made a post in support of Newt, you insinuated I was a hypocrite; yet you had no evidence for that statement. Yesterday I replied back to you w/my supporting logic and asked you for any substantiation you had for your ad hominem attack on me. So far, you have not even had the courtesy to reply back; yet you seem to have ample time to continue to post wildly speculative theories that are designed to undermine Newt's support.
Here is a link to the thread I am referring to above and my reply to you (See Post #45):
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2849066/posts