1 posted on
02/19/2012 5:33:21 PM PST by
John W
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: John W
colleagues urge man not to beat his wife.
To: John W
“Dempsey said an Israeli attack is “not prudent,”
Wow! Obama is no longer hiding his desire for Iran to get a nuke and “teach Israel a lesson”.
3 posted on
02/19/2012 5:39:52 PM PST by
tobyhill
FR Needs New Servers
Please Donate Toward The Purchase And Keep FR Up And Running!
![Hosted by imgur.com](http://i.imgur.com/cPqyb.jpg)
Click The Servers To Donate
4 posted on
02/19/2012 5:45:22 PM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
To: John W
Why not simply ask all Israelis to commit suicide...
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
7 posted on
02/19/2012 5:47:23 PM PST by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
To: John W
So, Obama and the Brits have Iran's back...
...THAT will make them behave now wont it?
8 posted on
02/19/2012 5:47:25 PM PST by
Happy Rain
("Better add another wing to The White House cause the Santorum clan is coming.")
To: John W
I could care less if the Jews blew Iran off the map. However, what I do mind is the hypocrisy of our goverment providing the "bunkerbuster bombs" to Israel then telling Israel not to use them.
10 posted on
02/19/2012 5:48:26 PM PST by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: John W
In their warnings, both the U.S. joint chiefs of staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, and British Foreign Minister William Hague said an Israeli attack on Iran would have grave consequences for the entire region... And an attack by Iran upon Israel, soon after the former manages to acquire a nuclear arsenal, would have worse than "grave consequences" on the latter...
13 posted on
02/19/2012 5:55:06 PM PST by
AmericanExceptionalist
(Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
To: John W
How about:
The US and Britain warn Iran that if they try to attack Israel the US and Britain will bomb them back to the stone ages.
14 posted on
02/19/2012 5:55:39 PM PST by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
To: John W
Israel ought to tell Obama to stick it. Obama spends three full years ignoring Israel, aiding and abbetting her enemies, giving money to Hamas in his first week in office, ignoring the pleas of the Iranians for a legitimate regime, giving away the candy store to Putin, and now—right up next to an election—Obama pretends to give a damn about Israel’s security.
Obama is a liar when he says he cares about the Jewish state. With a capital L.
To: John W
" ... urged Israel to give international sanctions against Iran more time to work ... "Yeah?
How long is that, Barry .... another 60 friggin' years?
16 posted on
02/19/2012 5:58:40 PM PST by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: John W
I’m sorry, I meant 6000 years
17 posted on
02/19/2012 5:59:19 PM PST by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: John W
We are already in a covert war. You cannot rush into battle.
19 posted on
02/19/2012 6:01:12 PM PST by
U-238
To: John W
I’ve heard so much about an “imminent” attack on Iran over the past ten years that I’ve grown cynical. I pay as much attention to these stories as I do the promises of American politicians to move the US Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.
20 posted on
02/19/2012 6:01:18 PM PST by
Zionist Conspirator
(Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
To: John W
The Israelis know one big thing: That the Narcissist in Chief cares far more about his re-election than he he does about Israeli, and for that matter, even US security.
An Israeli attack on Iran is opposed by the Obama White House not because the security reasons for doing so are not compelling, but because it would complicate his campaign strategy if Obama were forced to deal with the fallout, literally, of such an attack.
So the Zero WH is essentially telling the Israelis that His Majesty's reelection is more important than the survival of the State of Israel.
I leave you to guess the Israeli response to that.
22 posted on
02/19/2012 6:09:44 PM PST by
mojito
To: John W
I don’t understand.
Why not stand back and let Israel do what Israel believes is in its best interests?
OH... Wait. I get it.
Ubama needs to preach peace and diplomacy now, so that when he “reluctantly” gets the US involved in the Israel-Iran war, he can say he did everything he could to avoid military action. It’s funny how these plans always come together so nicely in an election year. In this case, the plan for war is the Democrat campaign strategy. Americans, the theory goes, do not like to fire war-time presidents.
To: John W
Uh, huh. And if Iran were to attack Israel with nukes, there would be calls for the remnants of the Israeli people to show “restraint”.
24 posted on
02/19/2012 6:13:13 PM PST by
rbg81
(scillian's)
To: John W
Publicly making these suggestions is an indication that they are for public consumption and do not represent the actual status of the relationship. It is part of the diplomacy and politics. One does not know from these things what the actual American position is.
I suspect that an attack this summer by the US or with US participation is in the cards, especially if the kenyan worries that he might not be re-elected.
26 posted on
02/19/2012 6:18:28 PM PST by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
To: John W
The UK, the UK, weren’t those the guys that signed a piece of paper with Hitler?
30 posted on
02/19/2012 6:37:49 PM PST by
Oatka
(This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
To: John W
More of Obama leading from behind. He won't come out of the closet and attack Israel directly, but he will run interference for Iran and the Islamists taking over Egypt and the rest of North Africa until they can attack Israel.
32 posted on
02/19/2012 6:44:50 PM PST by
Truth29
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson