Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HMS Surprise

I thought the standard narrative was:
1. The South didn’t like the elected President.
2. The South pretended unilateral secession, a power not belonging to the states to mask their insurrection.
3. The Southern rebels began a war on the United States.
4. The South lost.


2 posted on 02/18/2012 11:17:21 AM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: donmeaker
4. The South lost.

Obozo: "I Won"

4 posted on 02/18/2012 11:22:20 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: donmeaker

The key to understanding your post is #4: The South Lost. (I know you didn’t read the article by the way.) Might makes right? Are you therefore against all rebellion? Are you anti-Washington (George)? You speak of power, but what you really argue against is self-determination. To hate Southern rebels sways into hypocrisy if you support the original rebellion my friend.


6 posted on 02/18/2012 11:36:50 AM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can still go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: donmeaker
The south wouldn't lose again. You couldn't find enough military recruits in New York, LA, Chicago, Tampa, Miami, etc. (where all the Democrat Populace is) to enlist or even be conscripted....we'd kick their ass. It wouldn't be a NORTH/SOUTH thing either. More like an American/Heathen thing.....
300 posted on 03/05/2012 12:27:41 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson