Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man
I never said it wasn't cruel. I thought it was instructive however, to determine if the cruelty was intentional or not. I've said on this thread this guy wasn't right, but apart from the overt act, his motivations are probably worth exploring.

If you can't understand that, "I feel for you."

I do think it curious that your tagline, while no doubt meant in jest, refers to the casual killing of a fellow human, while mine, which I've had for years, is definitively pro-pet, but you somehow have me figured for an animal abuser apologist.

56 posted on 02/17/2012 6:36:49 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack

FSSSSSSSSSSSSSST


66 posted on 02/17/2012 8:28:25 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Joe 6-pack

Explain how, given the article descriptions and the ways the animals were killed, alive and conscious enough for others to hear them screaming, that it wasn’t intentionally cruel? He obviously didn’t chop the heads off first, presumably to avoid them suffering through skinning them, given the eyewitness account (that you for some reason believe there may be reason to cast doubt on). They clearly were put through this to feel pain before being killed.


70 posted on 02/17/2012 9:24:04 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson