If you can't understand that, "I feel for you."
I do think it curious that your tagline, while no doubt meant in jest, refers to the casual killing of a fellow human, while mine, which I've had for years, is definitively pro-pet, but you somehow have me figured for an animal abuser apologist.
FSSSSSSSSSSSSSST
Explain how, given the article descriptions and the ways the animals were killed, alive and conscious enough for others to hear them screaming, that it wasn’t intentionally cruel? He obviously didn’t chop the heads off first, presumably to avoid them suffering through skinning them, given the eyewitness account (that you for some reason believe there may be reason to cast doubt on). They clearly were put through this to feel pain before being killed.