Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibLieSlayer

IMHO, I would say around 5 years. Even shorter, if Iran develops a nuclear weapon.


21 posted on 02/12/2012 5:43:30 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: U-238

I agree.

LLS


22 posted on 02/13/2012 6:48:20 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: U-238
There are times where we are fairly sure we are right but really wish we were wrong.

I agree, a goo probability that within 5 - 7 years a nuke will be lit somewhere. Then we all need to pretend as if we're surprised and shocked, as if none of this was predictable and of course the witch hunt needs to ensue, after the real culprits (policy makers that are avoiding the issues and their consequences) will be long gone. It's no different with government deficit spending etc. We look and worry about there here and now not the consequences later.

Pakistan-India
Iran-Israel
North Korea-South Korea/Japan/USA

Soon, Japan (not really worried about them) will join the ranks, likewise because of Iran other Middle East nations will begin pursuit of such systems, Saudi Arabia being the obvious one having the money and infrastructure to support such a program...

BUT! The US is reducing her nuclear arms stockpiles, cutting on defense, missile defense and Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. “It's all good,” and Der Spiegel thinks we're on the right track, so everything has to be OK.

24 posted on 02/14/2012 2:07:17 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson