Replies

You just got through admitting that Santorum is as exciting and interesting as a dry dead stick, and yet, you hang your support 100% his way, to go up against the toughest most vile and corrupt media in our Nations history. Against one of the most hypnotic Marxist orators ever to hold public office, who holds hundred of millions of dollars in his campaign war chest.

And yet you believe Santorum can and will win, in spite of the impossibility that he can gather even enough delegates to meet the minimum requirement. But even more alarming is the fact that you refuse to understand Santorum's actual and very poor conservative record.

Considering just these few points I covered among countless others, it compels one to revisit the definition of insanity. Good job at clearly illustrating the definition thereof.

That's a nice, lengthy smokescreen to avoid the point of my post, which was to refute the notion that Santorum hasn't been vetted.

As I stated, people may have their reasons to oppose Santorum, but saying that his background has not been explored is simply wrong. Those that propogate that falsehood are at best ignorant, at worst willfully dishonest.

Which one are you?