Posted on 02/08/2012 2:52:34 PM PST by Red Badger
Bear with a fish.
Notice how the video fades out before it distinctly becomes a bear; oldest trick in the book.
Oh you poor dear.
Sorry to disappoint all of you, but the picture is clearly ‘Moochele’ on her recent visit to Seberia eating a healthy fish dinner.
I believe that it is clearly an establishment Republican with his nose out of joint because of recent developments.
I always hate it when someone puts Rosie’s head on Helen Thomas’s body.
If it would be true —this would be a great resource for Russia—They could make millions selling them and breeding them. There could be a mint to be made in zoos alone.
Not possible.
Indigenous tribes have been living there for thousands of years.
Agreed. The “trunk” is obviously lighter in color than the rest. It’s a fish a bear has grabbed by the head.
Problem with modern technology is the automation does not surrender control to hte operator. Back lighting in this instance is a problem. Getting the camera to focus on a distant object where the forground and background run through the subject is another. You need manual controls and the ability to use then on the fly. Most people can't react that quickly. We're going to keep getting crappy images of bigfoot and other reported strange creatures.
Woolly mammoth tusks curve up and almost join together around the trunk. Google it. Tons of pictures, all the same. The “tusk” in this video curves down and is suspiciously floppy. Ergo, bear with big fish.
It’s a bear with a fish. Zoom in and the head is shaped like a bears. And to my recollection, Tusks are not straign and point downwards at an angle.
Why is it that whenever anybody films Bigfoot, a Yeti, a Chupacabra, a UFO, or even the world’s last Wooly Mammoth they can NEVER seem to get a clear, in focus, shot????
ha
You think every specimen is going to have those perfect enormous majestic tusks like depicted in the artists’ pictures? I can show you plenty of REAL elephant pics with short straight tusks.
Looks like a brown bear with something in its mouth. The “trunk” is a different color than the rest of the animal and doesn’t move much. The animal doesn’t look to be struggling either.
If you WERE struggling in the water and had a built \-in snorkel, would you keep your nostrils down underwater?
Looks like a brown bear with something in its mouth. The “trunk” is a different color than the rest of the animal and doesn’t move much. The animal doesn’t look to be struggling either.
If you WERE struggling in the water and had a built-in snorkel, would you keep your nostrils down underwater?
And indigenous tribes have reported things like this for centuries, including in Alaska but know one believes them.
It would be easier to tell if we saw it emerge from the water. The structure of the legs and feet of a bear is much different than that of a mammoth. If the creature ran when it emerged from the water, it would be easy to tell. Even big brown bears clearly run but elephants (and I assume mammoths) just break into a fast walk. Entirely different gaits.
“Yes, it is worth a ping. There have been reports of sightings like this in the past.”
Thank you!!!!
Their stories come from the dead ones they find thawing from a glacier. By the time the story gets to the 5th “teller”, the story has changed to a living ferocious animal and they were lucky to escape alive.
It says the hair sample matches the hair of mammoths dug up in Siberia but I missed the part about how they got the new sample.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.