The Constitution of the United States begins with “We the People”; it does not begin with “We the Judges”. Federal judges need to take heed of that fact.
Posted on 02/07/2012 4:14:22 PM PST by VinL
Sic ‘em Newt!
Federal judges are substituting their own political views for the constitutional right of the people to make judgments about the definition of marriage.
Federal judges are substituting their own political views for the constitutional right of the people to make judgments about the definition of marriage.
Federal judges are substituting their own political views for the constitutional right of the people to make judgments about the definition of marriage.
Cannot be said enough...
What is festive about sodomy?
Well, the Constitution, thankfully, does limit the power of the majority to enact laws that would deny a minority the rights the Constitution protects. The proponents of gay “marriage” will no doubt compare this issue to the denial of civil rights to black people.
However, being black is an immutable physical characteristic. Demanding that society accept another definition of marriage is not protected or mandated by the Constitution.
Time for to get a President who will convene the 9th Circuit in Fairbanks AK.
When the judicial accomplishes what the executive and legislative cannot by thwarting “we the people”, you have TRIANGULATION BY TOTALITARIANS.
Life, liberty and the pursuit and destruction of TOTALITARIANS.
FUT
the argument the court used was the 14th amendment which is pathetic.
There is no constitutional right to marry.
even so homosexuals can marry so they are not being put into another class and not having rights taken away.
Now even if we get past all of that then the same court has to say muslims can now have 4 wives, mormons have 8 wives etc.
To say they are having right taken away is outrageous and saying they are pout int another class is not all correct
Then there is also the gun rights and gun owners which this court also is not keen on
The same court back years ago said that the voters did not do the right thing and their vote in the 90’s was not lawful and therefore they need to do a constitutional amendment.
The left knew this, the court said this and the homosexuals thought there would never be enough signatures to get it on the ballot, they were wrong.
So the homosexuals then thought they would win in a vote and so they went about intimidating people, spending millions upon millions on this amendment
They lost and then the lower court judge said it was unconstitutional , leaves the bench and then states he is a homosexual and wants to marry which in itself was wrong as he should have recused himself.
Now the 9th which stated they need a constitutional amendment now states the constitutional amendment is unconstitutional .
Under the guise of the 14th which is outrageous and they know it, we know it, the MSM knows it, the left knows it, the homosexuals know it and the GOP knows it but only Newt thus far as come out about it, possible Santorum will too and Paul but Romney will shut his elitist establishment RINO mouth
This is pure out and out judicial activism at it’s highest and these judges need to be removed and the GOP need for once grow a pair and take this on
Nothing from Mittens yet. I wonder why.
If an amendment could pass through both houses congress that defines marriage between a man and a woman, I predict that it would fly through a majority of state legilatures in record time.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
just said the same.
How pathetic the GOP has become that they put out a MA RINO thinking moderates might vote for him but ignore that 31 states which have been allowed to vote on this issue have all said no to the homosexual agenda.
if homosexuals really wanted to marry they would be flocking to Romney’s state MA but alas they are not and we all know that this marriage is all about attacking religion, ignoring the constitution and another step in their goal for their future socialist country.
Splitting the 9th into three parts is long overdue.
put the kook states of washington and california and oregun into one circuit and divide the rest up.
those racist laws were also a “mixing of the races” prevention attempt. IOW children.
Homosexuals contribute nothing to society’s future.
Time for a POTUS who will knock them back to size.
Nicely said.
Go, Newt.
It’s their choice to decide how to live.
that is by far the best idea to stop this madness.
They have been overstepping their activism for years now while making decent money in the process and then ignoring what the laws of the land.
This should have never even got to this point as the judge earlier came out after he left the bench and announced he was a homosexual and wanted to marry.
He should have recused himself or his decision thrown back to the lower courts.
Again the homosexuals went judge shopping like they did here in FL who I might add also did their homosexual activism.
I don’t watch FOX no more but I bet the likes of Hannity the fraud and Megyn Kelly the pro cross dresser and pro homo will be either ignoring all of this or covering for this blatant activism.
We need a nominee who will do as you say and go after these activist judges which begs me to ask.
When was the last time a judge was removed from the bench and what party etc did this?
Restrict the 9th Circuit to the peninsula. Create two new circuits ~ or, as I suggested simply convene the 9th in Fairbanks AK ~ it will take less than a year to clear the bench!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.