Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grand Canyon National Park to Eliminate Sale of Water in Disposable Containers
KCSG Television ^ | 2-7-12 | James Doyle

Posted on 02/07/2012 5:54:01 AM PST by SJackson

(Grand Canyon, AZ) - Grand Canyon National Park will eliminate the in-park sale of water packaged in individual disposable containers within 30 days under a plan approved Monday by National Park Service (NPS) Intermountain Regional (IMR) Director John Wessels. Free water stations are available throughout the park to allow visitors to fill reusable water bottles.

The park’s plan calls for the elimination of the sale of water packaged in individual disposable containers of less than one gallon, including plastic bottles and various types of boxes. The waste associated with disposable bottles comprises an estimated 20 percent of the park’s overall waste stream and 30 percent of the park’s recyclables.

Grand Canyon National Park’s plan was submitted and approved in accordance with the policy issued by NPS Director Jonathan B. Jarvis on December 14, 2011. Under the policy, parks are directed to implement a disposable plastic water bottle recycling and reduction policy, with an option to eliminate in-park sales – with the approval of the park’s regional director – following a thorough analysis of a variety of factors ranging from the cost to install water filling stations, to the cost and availability of BPA-free reusable containers, to potential effects on public safety.

Regional Director Wessels said, “Our parks should set the standard for resource protection and sustainability. Grand Canyon National Park has provided an excellent analysis of the impacts the elimination of bottled water would have, and has developed a well-thought-out plan for ensuring that the safety, needs and comfort of visitors continue to be met in the park," he said. "I feel confident that the impacts to park concessioners and partners have been given fair consideration and that this plan can be implemented with minimal impacts to the visiting public," Wessels added.

Grand Canyon National Park has experienced increasing amounts of litter associated with disposable plastic bottles along trails both on the rim and within the inner canyon, marring canyon viewpoints and visitor experiences.

“We want to minimize both the monetary and environmental costs associated with water packaged in disposable containers,” said Grand Canyon Superintendent Dave Uberuaga. “We are grateful to the Director for recognizing the need for service-wide guidance on this issue and for providing a thoughtful range of options.”

“A lot of careful thought went into this plan and its implementation,” said Director Jarvis. “I applaud Grand Canyon National Park for its efforts to reduce waste and the environmental impacts created by individually packaged water. This is another example of The National Park Service’s commitment to being an exemplar of the ways we can all reduce our imprint on the land as we embrace sustainable practices that will protect the parks for generations to come.”

Read more: KCSG Television - Grand Canyon National Park to Eliminate Sale of Water in Disposable Containers


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: ctdonath2

“We need a term which captures the essence of “right-wing environmentalism” without invoking watermelons.”

They used to be called “Men”


21 posted on 02/07/2012 6:27:28 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Life’s tough. It’s tougher if you’re stupid.
Making the effort to visit the Grand Canyon in summer without making the effort to take water is stupid.

At least by selling Nalgene bottles there will be less trash left out there, and what the stupids do leave out there will be reusable by others. 1 expensive bottle found and reused is better than 12 chincy bottles not worth recycling (much less reused by finder).

Sometimes PC and Conservative do sorta line up. Neither think it’s sensible to facilitate idiots littering.


22 posted on 02/07/2012 6:29:10 AM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

That’s why our subways in NYC are crawling with rats.
People who eat & drink on trains & buses should CARRY OUT THEIR TRASH.


23 posted on 02/07/2012 6:29:27 AM PST by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Yep, have plenty of free running water and maybe sell or rent with a higher deposit more permanent containers.


24 posted on 02/07/2012 6:29:36 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MachIV

This is the grand canyon, isn’t that basically a desert in many areas with limited amounts of surface water?


25 posted on 02/07/2012 6:32:49 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
This will do nothing to alleviate disposable bottles brought in by visitors. Nalgene bottles are expensive. Put a stamped deposit on disposable bottles sold in the park and people will bring them out for the deposit if they see them by the trail.

I see this as part of the left's war on bottled water, and largely not relevant to the stated issues as to why they are issuing a ban.

26 posted on 02/07/2012 6:33:52 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
You can bring refillable bottles. There are water stations to fill the bottles. We were just at the Grand Canyon last summer and this is what we did.

I see this as part of the left's war on bottled water. And I don't use bottled water. I just think there are better, more practical options than an outright ban.

27 posted on 02/07/2012 6:36:12 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Did the EPA outlaw the manufacturing of “Canteens”?


28 posted on 02/07/2012 6:36:12 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

SJ please add me


29 posted on 02/07/2012 6:36:58 AM PST by reed13k (Knight Rampant Bibliophile, Protector of Knowledge, Purveyor of Inquiry, Defender of Aged Wisdom, an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

Good question. No indication they will, but none they won’t either. Replace vending machines with BYOB[ottle] soda fountains?


30 posted on 02/07/2012 6:37:39 AM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
I’m no libby tree hugger but damn folks carry out your trash.

In my experience, libby tree-huggers are the problem.

31 posted on 02/07/2012 6:38:34 AM PST by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Water fountains - the Horror!

Next, the Luddites-N-Green will mandate we drink only from local springs.

And then only according to the rites of the Indigenous Peoples.

32 posted on 02/07/2012 6:39:21 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Did the EPA outlaw the manufacturing of “Canteens”?

OK, you're Joe Suburbanite. You want to buy four one-liter bottles for you, your wife and your kids. Normally would cost you six to eight bucks or so.

Instead, you are looking at 32 bucks for four Nalgene bottles at eight bucks each. You say screw that, you ain't paying that much for water, let's hit the trail without it. And one of the kids ends up dehydrated, collapses, and the rangers have to haul him out.

There are better solutions. Put a fifty-cent stamped deposit on bottles sold in the park, and people will pack out such bottles for the deposit refund if they find them by the trail.

I smell left-wing activism against bottled water here. There are better solutions to address the stated problems.

33 posted on 02/07/2012 6:40:37 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

There’s a difference between a ban and just not facilitating the activity. Not selling cheap bottles easily tossed as litter by those not smart enough to at least bring their own may not solve the problem, but it reduces facilitation of it.


34 posted on 02/07/2012 6:41:10 AM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6

I remember the Earth Day celebration on the Washington Mall...it took two days to pick up all of the trash they left behind.


35 posted on 02/07/2012 6:42:55 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Last summer I took the family hiking up the Boulder flat irons, Rocky Mt. Nat. Pk., Mesa Verde, Grand Canyon, Bryce Canyon, and many spots along the way. We carried canteens (gallon jugs in the car), but I could count the number of expended water bottles that we saw on one hand. Those appeared to be accidental drops over developed overviews.

Can’t say I saw a trash problem. As for cutting down on the amount of trash to carry out of parks, I’m thinking water containers should be at the bottom of the list. People need to hydrate.

I do think this will result in a fair amount of dehydration, as people who visit the parks are VISITORS, and don’t know how much water they need in dry, high elevations.

They should at least offer affordable canteen rigs if that is what they want to push.


36 posted on 02/07/2012 6:43:16 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

“That’s why our subways in NYC are crawling with rats.
People who eat & drink on trains & buses should CARRY OUT THEIR TRASH.”

Trash on two feet does not like to carry out their own trash.

Same for trash in a uniform.


37 posted on 02/07/2012 6:44:43 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Malsua; wolfcreek
If people weren’t generally ‘trashy’ and took out what they brought in, this wouldn’t be necessary. I agree. I was there in 2010 and while it was pretty clean, I still saw the occasional water battle or other trash laying around. I don't understand who does this. I suspect this really won't have much affect on the trash left behind as people will just pack it in and leave it anyway.

It is the same people that I witness on a regular basis that stand at a postcard view of the ocean then flick their cigarette into the oncoming wave. Or they drive some type of hybrid with an "Earth First' sticker and flick their cigarette right out the window.

38 posted on 02/07/2012 6:46:22 AM PST by New Perspective (Proud father of a 8 yr old son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama's death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6
In my experience, libby tree-huggers are the problem.

Yeah, read this and tell me this ain't based on liberal eco-nut viewpoints instead of an effort to find a practical way to deal with any actual underlying problem from trailside litter:

“A lot of careful thought went into this plan and its implementation,” said Director Jarvis. “I applaud Grand Canyon National Park for its efforts to reduce waste and the environmental impacts created by individually packaged water. This is another example of The National Park Service’s commitment to being an exemplar of the ways we can all reduce our imprint on the land as we embrace sustainable practices that will protect the parks for generations to come.”

39 posted on 02/07/2012 6:46:53 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Good.

I hate throwaway plastic water bottles. They are the biggest marketing “scam” (for lack of a better word) of my lifetime. Huge companies selling bottled NJ tap water at a 3000% markup to idiots. I’ll never understand it.

I love when people complain about $3.80 gas - extracted from the earth from thousands of miles away using high technology, transported, refined, transported and taxed - while sipping a $1.89 pint of tap water. do the math what that tap water - which is close to free in most of our country - costs per gallon.

If idiots don’t bring water/containers and decide to set off on a hike (how many tourists actually hike at the Grand Canyon anyway? 4% tops?) then screw ‘em.


40 posted on 02/07/2012 6:48:27 AM PST by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson