Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grunthor
It’s obvious what he mean’t. I can understand taking offense because well, it’s Wrong Paul....but I believe that the majority of American voters would agree with his sentiment.

Yes, in the absense of "Honest Rape" panels, abortion on demand is fine anyone willing to tell an MD or nurse she was raped. For somewhere between one day and seven months. Whether a majority of voters would agree would depend on where you put that outlying date, if first trimester or viability, you're probably right. And that's who Paul is appealing to, in a way that he or his supporters can describe him as pro-life. As always he's on both sides of the issue.

123 posted on 02/06/2012 5:30:19 AM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

When I’m arguing with a pro-abort, I choose the opposite tactic -

for every fringe case they bring up, I’ll rhetorically “allow” that exception,

leaving my “opponent” arguing for abortion on demand for convenience, and then I’ll make them defend that position.

If they’re the typical sheeperal who wants to think of themselves as a good person, instead of a radical feminist with a seared conscience, they are ashamed (but don’t change their mind - I’m just planting seeds).


129 posted on 02/06/2012 6:08:50 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson