Absolutely incorrect. He is a single-issue candidate, that he can supposedly create jobs (despite being awfully good at killing them and shipping them overseas at Bain Capital). As the economy does better, the rationale for his candidacy disappears. He can’t run against Obamacare because he was for it when it was called Romneycare. He is clueless as to conservative thought and unable to articulate a conservative message and argument to the country at large the way that Newt can. He has made a series of gaffes confirming that he’s an out-of-touch mega-millionaire which can easily be used to create a series of negative ads in the economically hard-hit states.
At Bain, or at any other corporation, is it the CEO’s obligation to maintain jobs in the US or to do well by his shareholders? Just wondering.