Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 5 February 2012
Various driveby media television networks ^ | 5 February 2012 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 02/05/2012 5:12:53 AM PST by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



February 5th, 2012

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): 2012 GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum; Gov. Bob McDonnell, R-VA; former Rep. J.C. Watts, R-Okla.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): 2012 GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich; New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg; Govs. Mitch Daniels, R-Ind., and Deval Patrick, D-Mass.; Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Gingrich; former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani.

THIS WEEK (ABC): 2012 GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul.

STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Govs. Martin O'Malley, D-Md., and Bob McDonnell, R-Va.; Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council; Dick Armey, chairman of FreedomWorks; Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: goneut; guests; lineup; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241 next last
To: Miss Marple

Glad to see you did not leave us! Always look forward to your comments.


221 posted on 02/05/2012 2:39:22 PM PST by MustKnowHistory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: carmody
And in the Senate trash they will sit because Romney doesn’t have a snowballs chance ... the media has a lock on the minds and opinions of the vast majority of voters.

Well, that's a little different story than your assertion that they have no ideas.

The GOP candidate is going to have to break through the smog of lies and you may think Romney has that ability.

I don't know why you think I'm a Mittens supporter. However the House Republicans and the GOP in general need to combat the lies and coverup of the RATagandists instead of making nice with the enemies

222 posted on 02/05/2012 2:49:27 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the Current Quarter Expenses.


223 posted on 02/05/2012 2:52:06 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JediJones

At Bain, or at any other corporation, is it the CEO’s obligation to maintain jobs in the US or to do well by his shareholders? Just wondering.


224 posted on 02/05/2012 3:15:13 PM PST by Last of the Mohicans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Last of the Mohicans

That’s a totally irrelevant question. We’re asking who is electable. And someone who engaged in that kind of business practice will lose many votes, as Carly Fiorina proved in California when she lost the Senate race. Once it’s pointed out and demonstrated in political ads, that activity will inspire much hate in voters.


225 posted on 02/05/2012 3:37:10 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; bray; All

God bless you both - now, do you think there’s any way to convince Santorum supporters of this wisdom? (RP-bots are beyond reason) If Newt had Rick’s votes and support, we could beat Mittens.


226 posted on 02/05/2012 4:17:35 PM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

Great post,we are making incremental progress,doesn’t happen over night.


227 posted on 02/05/2012 4:32:19 PM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: chiller
“I don't believe the TParty has gone anywhere, but has been waiting patiently for the next chance to strike, and so we will. As we grow larger with more TPartiers elected we will regain control over the RINO’s in the next cycle, or the one after that but withholding a vote for our nominee this time is a vote for Obama.”

When the MSM tells me that Romney is a ‘true’ conservative, I know we are done. With that and the lies, it spells doom. DOOM, I tell you,!

Doom

228 posted on 02/05/2012 4:37:33 PM PST by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Last of the Mohicans; All
Shareholders always come first. One of the huge complaints about how Bain raided some companies.They used the excuse of getting a huge return for their shareholders for totally destroying existing companies.Bad mgmt. IMHO.

They bought companies borrowed against the assets, doled out big bucks of working capital to shareholders and then slowly watched as the companies they had just bought slowly went out of business under the debt burden when they could not pay the debt back.Dirty pool,not capitalism something else.

229 posted on 02/05/2012 4:38:26 PM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky
I can't believe there are people such as you. Do you really THINK or are you a TROLL? You and the other blatherskites on here are simply drooling RINOs.

Sorry to make it personal but what is a fellow to do?

230 posted on 02/05/2012 5:19:03 PM PST by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat
Sorry to make it personal but what is a fellow to do?

I'm citing you for PWD.

231 posted on 02/05/2012 6:23:29 PM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
We are going to have to unify when we finally do have a candidate.

Yes, I hope if Romney is the nominee that we unify in voting for neither Romney nor Obama for president while voting for conservatives in Congress. The best strategy going forward in that scenario would be to put in as much gridlock as possible, or even enough of a Republican congress to push Obama the way Newt pushed Clinton in the '90s. In this scenario, we are also likely to put more Republicans in Congress in 2014. Then we will get another chance to nominate a conservative for President in 2016.

The damage that someone as liberal as Romney would do to the party is enormous. His economic policies inparticular are EXTREMELY liberal and those are ones that he hasn't flip-flopped on at all. He likes Romneycare, his tax policy is said by the WSJ to be similar to Obama's, I'm pretty sure part of that is him letting the Bush tax cuts expire for those making $200,000 or more, he believes in the status quo for the safety net/welfare state, he believes in class warfare (although unlike Obama he dislikes the poor as much as he does the rich), he likes increases in the minimum wage, he wouldn't back up Kasich on the anti-union vote, etc. Couple that with the fact that he's probably just lying about his positions on the social issues and will put in liberal Supreme Court justices.

How exactly does having this guy in office with an "R" next to his name help conservatives AT ALL? If he's popular, the party and the public will continue to push more and more RINO candidates on us, having the proof that they get votes. Which means our party will be taken over from within by liberals. If he's unpopular, then he gets voted out of office in 2016 and we get another far-left Democrat who will bring with him his own version of the 1994 Contract with America revolution except in liberal Democrat form. Romney as President is absolute POISON for the conservative agenda either in the short-term and the long-term. If he's the nominee the ONLY sensible option for conservatives is to vote in gridlock and try again for a better candidate in 2016.

I believe this site should stick around if Romney is the nominee and that the site should endorse the idea of voting anybody but Obamney (either of the two) for President while backing Republican House and Senate candidates. Note that I understand the need for RINOs in congress sometimes, because half a loaf is better than nothing in those very liberal districts, but having a RINO as president is a completely different story. The presidency is too important in both his power and as the defining figure in our party to put someone like Romney who doesn't come close to representing our party's values in the role.

232 posted on 02/05/2012 6:38:20 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
I’ll vote for a RINO any day of the week over a Democrat.

Then you don't have principles apparently. Do you think it's good for ANYONE to be President as long as they put an "R" after their name? Do you realize that if everyone had your attitude, it would be entirely possible for far-left liberals to completely take over our party from top to bottom? As for me I don't believe in "my party, right or wrong" other than I believe in "my country, right or wrong."

My question is how much of a RINO do they have to be for you to NOT vote for them? If any of the below were the Republican nominee for president (if they switched parties in some cases), and assuming they DID NOT change their positions from what they currently are, which ones would you NOT vote for as a Republican president or are they ALL preferable to Obama or whoever else the Democrats put up?

Arnold Schwarzenegger
Scott Brown
Dede Scozzafava
Arlen Specter
Lincoln Chafee
Hilary Clinton
Joe Manchin
Joseph Lieberman
Evan Bayh
Jack Abramoff
George Clooney
George Soros
Barack Obama (if he loses this year and runs 8 years later as a Republican)

233 posted on 02/05/2012 6:47:11 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: carmody

“What was it that Reagan said? I didn’t leave the republican party ... the republican party left me.”

Change the ‘republican’ to ‘democrat’ and you have it. H had been a long thime -D!


234 posted on 02/05/2012 7:01:57 PM PST by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

“Then you don’t have principles apparently.”

My ‘principles’ are to keep the 0 out of the Oval Office.


235 posted on 02/05/2012 7:05:28 PM PST by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat

The personalization of politics gets cheap and shallow at a certain point. We should be in this game because we support either liberal or conservative values. There’s no point in replacing Obama if you’re going to replace him with someone who has the same values and principles. Most importantly, making Obama Lite the leader of your party means you may not have a party that supports conservative values anymore a few years down the road, and even worse, probably fewer and fewer members of your party who believe in conservative values.


236 posted on 02/05/2012 7:10:38 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat

You know what? I see that you just got to Free Republic in 2010.

I live in one of the most conservative areas of the country. The people around here are weighing their choices and talking about who will be the best candidate. They are not acting like complete vulgarians and insulting everyone who disagrees with them, nor are they insulting the candidates.

I have been a poster here since 1998. I lived through the Florida recount and demonstrated on the steps of the state capitol here. I KNOW how conservative I am.

I do not know any conservatives like you and some of the others here who think it is the height of political discussion to just blather “Mitt is a liberal” and then call people names.

You guys act like the OWS people. What’s next, are you going to paint vulgar pictures of Romney on subway station walls?

There is a reason I am rarely here. People like you are unpleasant, unproductive, and frankly, you give the conservative movement a bad name.


237 posted on 02/05/2012 8:21:33 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative; RedMDer; trisham; DJ MacWoW; STARWISE; hoosiermama; TitansAFC; katiedidit1
You all gotta see the graphic & read the descriptions!


DONATE HERE

238 posted on 02/05/2012 10:25:33 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative; onyx

ROFLOL

BO was right...Some have been voted off the island.


239 posted on 02/05/2012 10:32:04 PM PST by hoosiermama (Stand with God and Sarah and Newt will be standing next to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

That hillbuzz comes up with some funny and witty stuff. I know they liked Sarah Palin. Guess they like Newt Gingrich too!!!


240 posted on 02/05/2012 10:45:23 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson