To: VinL
Too bad and too late.
The primaries are over and Mitt won and even Rush Limbaugh believes we need to get behind the nominee and focus our energies on going after Obama.
2 posted on
02/03/2012 11:42:46 AM PST by
Riodacat
(And when all is said and done, there'll be a hell of a lot more said than done......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: Riodacat
The primaries are over and Mitt won and even Rush Limbaugh believes we need to get behind the nominee and focus our energies on going after Obama. The primaries have just begun, but more importantly, I will never vote for Romney. I will vote 3rd party, write in a candidate or stay home, but I will not vote for a candidate like Romney who is no better than Obama. Why would I waste my time or vote?
95 posted on
02/03/2012 8:21:41 PM PST by
Proudcongal
(NEWT/PERRY or NEWT/SANTORUM or NEWT/PALIN 2012!)
To: Riodacat
Rush Limbaugh = Karl Rove.
111 posted on
02/04/2012 5:47:42 AM PST by
reasonisfaith
(Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, and many others.)
To: Riodacat
The primaries are over and Mitt won and even Rush Limbaugh believes we need to get behind the nominee and focus our energies on going after Obama.
1. There is no nominee yet.
2. Except, according to the RNC rules that existed prior to the primary and that still control, Romney cannot be awarded all 50 delegates. In fact, according to the rules, if the state had not amended its procedures to proportional awarding of delegates before the primary, the results of the primary itself are void, since a winner take all state is forbidden to hold a primary before April.
122 posted on
02/04/2012 10:40:19 AM PST by
aruanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson