Also defined as a hypothetical you'd simply rather not answer. Gotcha.
"I don't think she'd run. And wasn't it YOU that pointed out that Palin DIDN'T run because of family? Hm?"
Now who's talking about apples and oranges? I pointed out that Sarah declined to run in '12, at least in part because of her cares and concerns for her family...and was criticized by many here for not putting her patriotic duty above her family. The fact of the matter is, she did run (for VP) in '08 in spite of having a newly born special needs chile. Which time was she right and which time was she wrong?
"Trig isn't dying. Bella will. You can't dress that up."
And I would suspect nobody is more painfully aware of that than Rick and his wife. It's pretty damned vain of you to presume you are more concerned about that child's needs and well being more than her own father. I would imagine they've thought about, prayed upon and come to the conclusions they have, and neither you or I have been privy to any of that. I, consistent with what most conservatives argue, am happy to let them make their own decisions and pursue what they feel is best. You on the other hand, clearly without knowledge of all the family dynamics, discussions, tears, prayers etc. feel you know what's best for them and what they should do.
I most certainly DID answer. I stated: "I don't think she'd run. And wasn't it YOU that pointed out that Palin DIDN'T run because of family? Hm?"
Now who's talking about apples and oranges?
You're not very good at this, are ya.
Palin DIDN'T run because of her children.
Santorum IS running despite having a child that will NOT live long.
You can try and twist that all you like. It is what it is. The dude is a skunk!