Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Shrew

Does anyone here from Kansas know in what diocese this evil witch Sebelius resides and who the bishop is? She should be formally and publicly excommunicated. I understand that excommunication is a self-executing thing (latae sententiae) in most cases but the Church NEEDS to hold this evil thing up before the public as poster thing for excommunication. Long before she joined Obozo, Sebelius was politically snuggling with the notorious abortionist of Wichita, the late Killer Tiller. That she has not yet been publicly excommunicated is in itself a scandal. If someone posts the diocese and bishop, send him respectful letters requesting that he excommunicate her for her extraordinary efforts to maximize baby-killing and because she is a scandal to the Church.


98 posted on 02/01/2012 10:50:47 AM PST by BlackElk ( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk
That foul creature Sebellius is under the canonical jurisdiction of His Excellency Joseph Naumann, Archbishop of Kansas City and His Eminence Donald Cardinal Wuerl, Archbishop of Washington.

Both of them have instructed the foul creature Sebellius NOT to present itself for Holy Communion.

The thumbscrews, the rack, and the stake are, as always, available ... but not authorized for use in these United States at this time.

107 posted on 02/01/2012 1:36:16 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: BlackElk; All
98 posted on Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:50:47 PM by BlackElk: “Does anyone here from Kansas know in what diocese this evil witch Sebelius resides and who the bishop is? She should be formally and publicly excommunicated. I understand that excommunication is a self-executing thing (latae sententiae) in most cases but the Church NEEDS to hold this evil thing up before the public as poster thing for excommunication.”

Agreed.

I have seen several excommunications over the years. They're necessary in cases of gross public sin. If this isn't gross public sin by publicly threatening to persecute the church of which you are theoretically a member,what else could possibly qualify?

I suspect the idea was to avoid making a “martyr” of this woman by simply advising her of the canon law on the matter regarding automatic excommunication, thereby avoiding drawing sympathy toward her as a “victim.” Maybe that's okay with a pro-choice politician who doesn't make a big deal of his views.

Well, this woman not only makes a big deal of her views but threatens to persecute her own church. Time to respond with a formal public excommunication. Most secularists who are fair will understand private organizations can set their own membership rules, and this woman did take on her own church in public, so she isn't a good example of a victim.

119 posted on 02/01/2012 6:39:07 PM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson