[wtc911]

If Romney ends up as the nominee, there is no way I can vote for him.

__________________________________

Then I would bave to consider you part of the destruction of America.

I am no fan of Romney but another four years of obama will give us two more activist, lesbian SCJs (can you say Chief Justice Sotomayor?) and guarantee the destruction of Constitutional governance for two generations which means forever.

I see it this way...we are Britian in 1940. The race for the WH is our Battle of Britian. If we lose it (as defined by re-electing obama) then there will be no D-Day...there will be no platform from which to satge the next phase of the war...there will be nothing left.

Staying at home in protest is the same as surrendering the field.

[stonehouse01]

” ... Britain 1940 ...”

You are right in your analysis - not right on the solution; Romney is not the answer.

The answer is - lets dump some tea and soon. I live in New York State and the milquetoast Pataki mentalilty just leads to the next Cuomo.

Let’s fight!!!

[ZX12R]

Staying at home in protest is the same as surrendering the field.

Stop using this same old lame ass GOP argument every election. YOU are the one being led to the slaughter by the (lesser of two evils) ring in your nose. Wake up! The same old direction to more erosion won't cut it any longer. This election is the last chance to change that direction. One more moderate is all it will take, and the party is over for America. It's an all or nothing moment. Choose wisely.

Just having an "R" as your affiliation, is no longer an acceptable minimum standard. The problems we face are immense and fatal. That day has come.

[Psalm 144]

Romney and Obama are distinctions without a difference. If Romney epitomizes what you oppose and you vote for him anyway, you have sold your soul. For nothing. Not one thing.

Assuming Romney is the GOP candidate then a better analogy is that we are Norway in 1940. Rallying behind “our guy” is rallying behind Vidkun Quisling.

This choice without an option for the distinction without a difference is by design. Obama must not remain in the Whitehouse and Romney must never arrive.

[vmivol00]

I will not stay home, but I will not support or vote for a POS like Romney.

Why is ok in your mind to support a socialist, gun grabber, who routinely appointed liberal judges, distanced himself from Reagan, supported Planned Parenthood, donated to and supported liberal candidates just because he has an R behind his name?

You have been trained well.

Continuing to support liberal candidates that belong in a Dem primary who masquerading as conservatives is liking the GOP and conservative momentum. That in turn is killing the US.

Brainless people who continually support who their GOP masters tell them to are the problem.

I will not support the continued destruction of the US by a candidate in either party. If you think a Romney Presidency will be substantially different from an Obama Presidency you have been fooled.

[battletank]

“I am no fan of Romney but another four years of obama will give us two more activist, lesbian SCJs “

Not if they can’t get through the Senate approval process. And THAT is why it is imperative that we flood the Senate AND the House with conservatives!

[Road Glide]

Regardless of what others say, yours is a thoughtful and reasoned post.

I don’t want Romney either. But I’m not so foolish as to believe that he would be “just like Obama” in the White House.

Having Romney in the Oval Office would be the equivalent of having a mushy-middle-left democrat. Think LBJ without the legislative “oomph” behind him. So long as we retain a unified majority in at least one house of Congress, he won’t be able to do much damage.

But Obama is an out-and-out communist. Always was, always will be. And having succeeded in circumventing the Constitution in minor ways in his first term, he will “reach for more” in a second one.

Regardless of the damage Romney may do, it pales in comparison to the damage we _know_ Obama _will_ do.

That’s my opinion. I realize others’ may differ....

[leprechaun9]

... but another four years of obama ...

Too much credit/blame is given to CZAR B.O. He is merely the negro spokesman for the Democraps so that they can brand any objector to their Socialist initiatives as RACIST!

Every piece of legislation that CZAR B.O. signed into law was passed by a DEMOCRAP CONGRESS. That is where I believe the focus of our efforts should be directed. 21 DEMOCRAP SENATORS are up for reelection in 2012.

[leprechaun9]

... but another four years of obama ...

Too much credit/blame is given to CZAR B.O. He is merely the negro spokesman for the Democraps so that they can brand any objector to their Socialist initiatives as RACIST!

Every piece of legislation that CZAR B.O. signed into law was passed by a DEMOCRAP CONGRESS. That is where I believe the focus of our efforts should be directed. 21 DEMOCRAP SENATORS are up for reelection in 2012.